British Comedy Guide

Sherlock Holmes Page 5

Quote: Kenneth @ April 26 2009, 11:58 AM BST

According to The Sherlock Holmes Cookbook (1928, Columbo University Press), there is no excuse for skipping the rice bit. As for going straight to the fish, that's a real no-no. Instead, Holmes recommends that you cover some dried Welsh mushrooms in hot red wine and soak. Heat a spoonful of peanut oil in a beguiling 9-inch copper skillet. Add chicken thighs (not fish!) and cook until golden. Carve chicken into small pieces. Add onion and sauté for about 5 minutes. Add crushed garlic, ginger, bay leaf and rosemary, and cook for two more minutes. Drain the Welsh mushrooms and add them to the skillet, along with a handful of red toadstools. Cook until liquified toadstool rings begin to appear. Add a dash of pork sausage and wombat juice and cook for 40 seconds. Add Portuguese red wine and reduce for about 2 minutes. Stir in a cup of mashed tomatoes and cook for 3 minutes. By now your rice should be cooked. Strain the rice and add in even layers. Cover with 1 quart of badger semen-stock and season with opium poppy seeds. When the badger semen-stock begins to boil and coagulate, reduce to simmer and cook for 15 minutes. Then serve immediately.

Naaa, f**k it. I'll have cheese on toast instead. Thanks for the recipe though. Duly copied.

I today brought every episode of the Jeremy Brett series, RRP £120 I got it for £40 at HMV. I won't be watching it religiously, but I'll gradually work my way through the 41 episodes. I've never really watched the Brett series, so I'll be interested to see if it is true that as many people so keenly point out- Brett is the best. Will be hard to beat Rathbone and Cushing though.

On film, there's only one Sherlock Holmes - and that's Basil Rathbone.

No other actor has ever come close. Cool

Yeah, I'll ditto the Rathbone love. Those films are fantastic.

The Brett versions are great, but unfortunately towards the end of that run they made the mistake of producing two hour adaptations of short stories that didn't really merit such a lengthy version.

I always liked the Brett versions...when I was a kid his version of "Hound of the Baskervilles" kind of scared me

Quote: jmorton @ November 17 2009, 9:28 AM GMT

I always liked the Brett versions...when I was a kid his version of "Hound of the Baskervilles" kind of scared me

Sad he killed himself. He was a superb Holmes. :(

Quote: john lucas 101 @ November 17 2009, 9:12 AM GMT

Yeah, I'll ditto the Rathbone love. Those films are fantastic.

The Brett versions are great, but unfortunately towards the end of that run they made the mistake of producing two hour adaptations of short stories that didn't really merit such a lengthy version.

I noticed that. There is one of the short story Charles Agustus Milverton. I've read the book but not watched the adaptation yet, but it seems almost impossible to make a two hour episode of that one story.

I'm a Brett man myself.

Was the man. Teary

Quote: Jack Massey @ 22nd April 2009, 1:16 AM BST

Please please please, I need some advice from anybody who has read the first Holmes novel A Study in Scarlett. It is a book split into two parts, part one about Holmes and Watson meeting, the case coming up and the murderers identity being revealed and then part two is a big long bit about Mormons in America (in third person,chapters about them) and the final two chapters are about Holmes telling of his conclusion to the murder.
Anyway, anyone who's read it will know all this. Basically, I read the first part and evoked so much passion for it, but then I got to the Mormon chapters and it is boring the arse off me and all the passion has gone.

Reading the recently published collection of P.G. Wodehouse's letters, I recalled your complaint about A Study in Scarlett. Wodehouse seems to have shared your low opinion of the story's flashback plot device. Part of an October 1914 letter to his friend Leslie Havergal Bradshaw (the model for Bingo Little) reads:

Are you reading the Sherlock Holmes story in the Sunday Tribune? I guessed the solution with ridiculous ease a week ago. I call it a low down trick of Doyle to ring in one of those Part Two acts, like in The Study in Scarlet [sic], where the action is suddenly shoved back twenty years and Holmes put into the background.

The first story to which he refers is The Valley of Fear.

Quote: T.W. @ 17th November 2009, 5:29 PM GMT

Sad he killed himself. He was a superb Holmes. :(

Erm, he died from his b*ggered heart valves.

Anyone read this -

http://www.doctorwhohub.tv/?p=1570

Quote: Charlie Boy @ 16th January 2014, 6:51 PM GMT

Anyone read this -

http://www.doctorwhohub.tv/?p=1570

A quick look would indicate that that is about the tawdry follow up to the proper thing.

A little known fact
Did you know that the Deerstalker was actually the prequel to the Deer Hunter

nice

Share this page