British Comedy Guide

Meet the Writers: Ariane Sherine Page 5

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ November 8 2009, 9:26 PM GMT

What a bizarre thing to say. Surely if we had absolute proof that the creator of the universe wanted us to do certain things and had the power of life and death over us and could torture us for eternity if we didn't follow orders, we'd all start believing in him immediately. Religion would be almost obligatory overnight, the gays would all straighten up, and the shellfish would finally be safe.

But there wouldn't be any 'faith'. You can't have 'faith' in something that exists -- it doesn't make sense. That's not the point of 'faith', and religion is all about faith.

You wouldn't have to 'start believing' because he'd be fact.

Dan

Quote: swerytd @ November 8 2009, 9:43 PM GMT

You wouldn't have to 'start believing' because he'd be fact.

Dan

Like Santa Claus.

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ November 8 2009, 9:26 PM GMT

Yeah, those smug atheists. You never see a smug Christian, do you?

Well, except the ones who believe they're going to spend eternity in bliss while I get a trident rammed up my arse for infinity, eg all of the f**kers.

There was a discussion about this on here (I think) before; there is a kind of smugness from atheists, especially in comedy, that they know better and people with religious - or even - spritiual faith - are all idiots with beliefs akin to thinking Father Christmas is real and ripe for taking the piss out of.

Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 8 2009, 9:46 PM GMT

There was a discussion about this on here (I think) before; there is a kind of smugness from atheists, especially in comedy, that they know better and people with religious - or even - spritiual faith - are all idiots with beliefs akin to thinking Father Christmas is real and ripe for taking the piss out of.

Loser. ;)

Quote: swerytd @ November 8 2009, 9:43 PM GMT

You wouldn't have to 'start believing' because he'd be fact.

Dan

There are plenty of facts that a great many people don't believe in.

Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 8 2009, 9:46 PM GMT

they know better and people with religious - or even - spritiual faith - are all idiots with beliefs akin to thinking Father Christmas is real and ripe for taking the piss out of.

Sounds about right to me.

Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 8 2009, 9:46 PM GMT

to thinking Father Christmas is real and ripe for taking the piss out of.

You mean he isn't?

Teary

Quote: dannyjb1 @ November 8 2009, 9:50 PM GMT

You mean he isn't?

Teary

No, I mean he is real. How else do all the presents arrive, silly? :$

I didn't think he was for a long time, but then I found him fighting Santa Claus on my roof... Now *that* was a surprise!

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ November 8 2009, 9:49 PM GMT

There are plenty of facts that a great many people don't believe in.

But they're 'facts', so those people are wrong.

Dan

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ November 8 2009, 9:49 PM GMT

Sounds about right to me.

Thus proving my point. Cool

Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 8 2009, 9:58 PM GMT

Thus proving my point. Cool

I'm not sure that I was disagreeing with you. Merely pointing out that any smugness exhibited by non-believers pales in comparison to the magic powers religious folk claim for themselves.

Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 8 2009, 9:46 PM GMT

There is a kind of smugness from atheists, especially in comedy, that they know better and people with faith are all idiots akin to thinking Father Christmas is real and ripe for taking the piss out of.

It's the straw dog argument that feeds a sense of elitism. Reduce your opponent's real beliefs to nonsensical simplistic distortions that are easily brushed aside. It's also the reason why both sides fail to win the debate. All belief systems are incredibly complex, malleable (despite the appearance of inflexibility), and have a self-contained logic. That's why they've survived empires and races. You're not going to win millenia-old debates with straw dogs. And, tbh, any person you can convince with a straw dog argument is one you'd want to keep firmly in the other side's camp.
:)

Quote: Kevin Murphy @ November 8 2009, 9:49 PM GMT

Sounds about right to me.

Some of the world's greatest minds were and are Christian or from other faiths. Some were not. This should be remembered whenever believers from either camp have their intellectual capacity questioned. It is not a question of intellect v blind faith or logic over non-logic or else the world would be strictly layered along IQ lines, into intellectual atheists and subnormal believers. That it isn't is proof that it's often down to a person's particular preference, rather than their intellect, as to what they finally choose to believe.

As to Dan's point re: if God is proven, would faith end? From my understanding of it, no. Even if proof existed, some people would choose not to believe despite the evidence. Some wouldn't care and carry on as if God didn't exist. The religious folk would still need faith to believe their particular walk was the right one. Faith is a strange beast. It doesn't always mean belief in the intangible, it envelopes conviction and trust (amongst other things). Faith is not purely a religious trait. Independent of God's existence; every person, every moment, lives by faith. It's the object of that faith that differs.
:)

Sorry to be glib but isn't a "Straw dog argument" one about the film director Sam Pekinpah?

Surely you mean "Straw man"?

Wicker Man?

Quote: SlagA @ November 9 2009, 12:46 PM GMT

It's the straw dog argument that feeds a sense of elitism. Reduce your opponent's real beliefs to nonsensical simplistic distortions that are easily brushed aside.

I'm not sure I agree with that. The real core belief of Christianity, for example, is that Jesus rose from the dead and ascended bodily to heaven. You can dispense with the devil snake, Noah, burning bush, and maybe even the miracles, but once you get rid of the resurrection it's not Christianity any more. With Islam, you have to believe an angel talked to the prophet. I don't think either of these statements constitute simplistic distortions, but they're certainly very easy to brush aside.

Quote: Tony Cowards @ November 9 2009, 12:56 PM GMT

Surely you mean "Straw man"?

Yes. :$ Now you know why I don't like heights. Too far to fall. :)

Share this page