Alright mate. I'm going to give you my honest opinion because that is what any prod companies will do.
I didn't like it. It didn't seem real or plausible to me. As a former psychology student, I don't know why one would go up to someone and start 'analysing' them. Clearly, this is an early draft so I won't hold any spelling errors against you, but make sure your SPAG is perfect before you do anything with it (e.g. one of the 'psychology' references is spelt wrong, and 'apologies' is spelt wrong in there too - obviously that doesn't affect the quality of the comedy, but its professionalism that'll make you stand out rather than being thrown in the bin). I didn't feel the jokes were strong enough either; it's a cringe-style humour (similar to the excellent work of Gervais & Merchant), but I don't feel its up to their high standard of cringe...maybe thats just because to me it felt forced, I don't know.
On the other hand, several people have said they do like it, so perhaps take my comments with a pinch of salt. You clearly have a character who stands out for the norm and who you have a lot of potential avenues to work with. And as I'm sure it's an early draft of the piece, you can tighten it up and make it a lot stronger.
If I was you and had just written that, I'd read it through and have a re-think about the set-up for the jokes and the execution of them. Then do a re-draft which will be much improved. But again, that is just me...you are probably looking for a different type of humour that I would be, so ignore whichever bits of this advice you feel are not appropriate for you. Good luck, mate.