Quote: Harridan @ November 30 2012, 10:46 PM GMTI think that's more to do with her catching you in the bathroom with a copy of the Radio Times.
Oh the shame.
Quote: Harridan @ November 30 2012, 10:46 PM GMTI think that's more to do with her catching you in the bathroom with a copy of the Radio Times.
Oh the shame.
Quote: zooo @ November 30 2012, 10:47 PM GMTStop using long words!
K!
S'better.
Quote: Harridan @ November 30 2012, 10:52 PM GMTBURN HIM! Come on, Sisters! Purge the woman-hater from our midst!
Quote: zooo @ November 30 2012, 10:33 PM GMTYou're not... judging women by using the Miranda test as a test are you?
Read him his Miranda Rights, he's going down!
I think it proves the theory that we tend to find funny people more attractive because they make us laugh.
Yep. Why else would I fancy Gervais?
Quote: zooo @ November 30 2012, 11:09 PM GMTYep. Why else would I fancy Gervais?
eww
Hehe. Soz.
Quote: zooo @ November 30 2012, 11:09 PM GMTYep. Why else would I fancy Gervais?
Out of all the unconventional people you're attracted to, zooo, Gervais isn't the one that worries us.
I shall take that to mean that you feel the magnetism of the Gervaisinator too.
I like his mate Stephen Merchant.
I like him, but don't fancy him.
So a double date then?
Quote: chipolata @ November 30 2012, 10:32 PM GMTAlthough the more interesting thing about Miranda is that she's become a sort of test that women use to judge men. Say she's attractive, you've passed. Say she's not, you've failed.
Yes, but you are also then guilty of objectification and therefore fail. Women always use variations of the Kobayashi Maru test, which is why men can never win.