Quote: lofthouse @ May 25 2011, 10:28 PM BSTDamn it dude.
She be byowwtiful.
There, at least someone is looking at her face!
Well, I assume.
Who do you fancy? Page 601
See it annoys me sometimes when they put drop dead pretty girls in sitcoms as I get distracted and lose track of whats going on.
It was the same with Samantha Janus in Game On.
For three series I just sat there bewitched by her totally scruminess. I'd suddenly snap out of it and realise I hadnt a bloody clue what had been going on for the last ten minutes.
More fugly hippocrocopigs in sitcoms I say!
Am oot.
Perhaps you should try to send more blood to your brain.
Watch TV standing on your head or something.
How does standing on your head stop you being attracted to chicks?
meh
i'll give it a go...
That was a very Eddie Hitler response. I liked it. 
Quote: Ben @ May 25 2011, 8:29 PM BSTKaty Wix is cute. I don't think I've met any unattractive Katy's.
Spot on in both sentences, Ben.
Does this include Katies?
Especially Katies, zooo.
What about Katherines? And Kates?
Or Catherines?? 
So many questions...
Quote: zooo @ May 27 2011, 6:56 PM BSTWhat about Katherines? And Kates?
Or Catherines??So many questions...
No, No, Yes.
Next.
What about Kathys Gav?
Quote: zooo @ May 27 2011, 6:56 PM BSTWhat about Katherines? And Kates?
Or Catherines??So many questions...
Katherine Parkinson- yes.
Kate Winslet- yes.
Catherine Windsor- no, too boney.
Quote: KLRiley @ May 27 2011, 7:00 PM BSTWhat about Kathys?
Beale?
Quote: KLRiley @ May 27 2011, 7:00 PM BSTWhat about Kathys Gav?
No. Never.
Katherine Parkinson- yes. No
Kate Winslet- yes. No definitely not.
Catherine Windsor- no, too boney.<---Sounds like a Royal so no is the correct answer.