Who do you fancy? Page 1,031

Eep, I've caused a war!

But I wasn't moaning or saying you shouldn't choose pics like that and neither was Zooo. I just don't get it, but if that's what floats your boat then ok fair enough!
But blokes with their tops off isn't anything like the same thing! I think you all know that really

If you don't understand something about women then you can say so and we won't say you're moaning!!

Now, more Jason pics please...
This weeks was a let down

Quote: lofthouse @ October 27 2013, 12:51 PM GMT

Ok??

Satisfied??

View original

Quote: lofthouse @ October 27 2013, 12:51 PM GMT

Ok??

Satisfied??

View original

Anything you say will be taken down in evidence

Niquarbs

Quote: Hannah G @ October 27 2013, 1:35 PM GMT

But blokes with their tops off isn't anything like the same thing! I think you all know that really

View original

Course it is! Pointless chest display, pointless showing a bit of leg. Same coin!

I can only speak for myself, but seeing a bit of a man's leg isn't remotely arousing.

But a bare chest is, it seems. As, it seems, is the "skank"-iness of a woman showing a bit of leg. As above.

Quote: lofthouse @ October 27 2013, 12:51 PM GMT

View original

Phwaor!! Will you look at the eyes on that!!

Quote: Aaron @ October 27 2013, 5:32 PM GMT

But a bare chest is, it seems. As, it seems, is the "skank"-iness of a woman showing a bit of leg. As above.

View original

Hardly 'a bit of leg'. That is literally all of her leg, and parts of her arse.

But anyway I personally never said that pic was skanky. More a bit risqué.

Quote: zooo @ October 27 2013, 3:51 PM GMT

I can only speak for myself, but seeing a bit of a man's leg isn't remotely arousing.

View original

That bit right in the middle though is kinda ok...

You mean the knee?

Is that a euphemism?

Quote: zooo @ October 27 2013, 3:51 PM GMT

I can only speak for myself, but seeing a bit of a man's leg isn't remotely arousing.

View original

Go on, tell me you're not just a bit moist...

Quote: Aaron @ October 27 2013, 3:05 PM GMT

Course it is! Pointless chest display, pointless showing a bit of leg. Same coin!

View original

Yes, but this example isn't sexy...this is disgusting!

EDIT: Sorry for using this thread to live out my Bieber fascination.

Not more of your Justin pics, Gordon!

Quote: Tursiops @ October 27 2013, 5:42 PM GMT

Go on, tell me you're not just a bit moist...

View original

I think those shoes were designed as an arousal preventative. Put Keanu Reeves in those and I wouldn't be able to go near him.

Let's get the ogling thread back on track!

This might possibly be my dream woman:

Nice hair colour.