I'm hearing more than a few gripes about a certain stage show that recently asked the group for submissions.
The pet peeve of a writer is not receiving feedback on a submission but it's worse when a group of writers submit and then appear to recieve not even a basic courtesy email acknowledgement for reciept of material. Worse than that is when the submission is sent to a group of writers / actors who have also been through the horrible cycle of silent rebuff and know what it feels like. That they then willingly pass this feeling on to fellow writers, who have enough rejection to contend with from production companies and broadcasters is (being generous here) unthoughtful.
That the call came from a member of this forum and that questions asked (in the original thread asking for submissions) were ignored is icing on the cake.
The excuse that too many submissions were recieved for email acknowledgement is invalid. In these days an automated email response is basic website setup.
Personally writing for these type of shows is pointless. First, the money is a pittance and paid rather hesitantly. Second, the show and its actors garner the praise whereas the writers providing the material seem inconsequential. Third, if the creative genius is within the core stage group why does it need submissions from outside?
There is one stage show that pays on time but the money is still a pittance when you consider that the organisers are getting a 'very' nice wage from your work.
So please, NewsRevue (and other shows), if you ask for submissions at least treat your writers with a bit more respect. If you're busy, or swamped, automate it. If you're not, then go hang your head in shame. And remember, when you're next treated badly by others in the biz, you have no just cause for complaint.