Billy Bunter
Saturday 8th June 2019 9:23pm
The Sussex Coast
4,757 posts
It was ok as a story and as an opportunity to hear some of his better (ie pre-1976) songs again but one has to query its authenticity. Basically the film was a convenient vehicle for Elton John to even a score and avenge perceived wrongs done to him over the course of his life, particularly by his father and by John Reid and, to a lesser extent, by his mother and by Bernie Taupin.
The songs were featured incorrectly chronologically (eg "Daniel" being sung at the initial interview with Dick James and "Saturday Night's Alright for Fighting" sung in a pub by an adolescent Elton John). While the makers of the film may have claimed that that was "artistic licence", the question is "why?" and what else was not true to fact?