fopdoodle
Saturday 8th April 2017 8:35am [Edited]
Edinburgh
623 posts
Quote: Davida Grimes @ 8th April 2017, 2:22 AM
I'd like to think all the world war III hype and speculation is possibly largely just sensationalism generated within the liberal bubble. We've survived similarly horrible leaders/events/policies/disasters again and again throughout history and we're still broadly speaking in-tact. Are we not?
I am actually a very positive, upbeat and cheerful person - so psychologically my posts are not about sharing my beliefs in doom and gloom, but are actually saying, for the love of God, we have to get this russet walrus out before he f**ks anything else up!
He had me going for a nano second on making announcement regarding Syria strikes, but looking down and talking slowly only makes a person seem emotional if the rest of the time they demonstrate mania by spouting off nonsense using words like 'tremendous' and 'fantastic' and throwing their hands around. And why does everyone seem to be a 'great' or 'fantastic' guy when mentioning people, and sometimes also 'very professional'? I think he does it for points. He says complimentary stuff hoping to keep his popularity up, but because he's such a ridiculous f**kwit, he decides instead to piss off the people with power . . . his fellow lunatics in charge of other countries.
He may be getting a bit of kudos for the air strikes now, because some are gullible enough to buy that he was 'doing it for the people' but A: He sent other people to do his dirty work while he sat comfortably at 'home' googling himself in his pyjamas, and B: There's no way he did it for the greater good, or strategically after giving proper thought to what happens as a consequence, and what he does next.
There is a chance it was illegal due to international law, the constitution (and even the Geneva Convention was mentioned) or not consulting relevant people or going through proper channels first that could get him out somehow, and I still maintain there will be something he bungles so badly that the courts will have to take action (who he has already alienated by insulting, so they should make a new law for him - and he won't even know, because he doesn't even have an 'O' level for his own job!) because it can just be the catalyst in a whole plethora of violations including contradiction, lying, incompetence and conflicts of interest given his current businesses. Though of course, getting him to lie under oath would be the easiest . . .
But apart from already having cost the taxpayer in 3 months what Obama did in 2 years in leisure activities (so in effect, taking 7 times more than he did, which will no doubt continue) and deceiving his own people over and over and over again, I struggle to imagine what he will have to do to achieve 0% approval, because it's still at around 36%, so a ballpark third of Americans think he's doing alright when he's already shafted them left and right and done a complete U turn on more than one promise he made to get him elected.
It's just mind boggling . . . then there's the cost of security - because on top of the standard level of protection needed for any president, he needs far more because there are people who DO hate him enough, and I have to say, it would only take one to get through . . . who might even be hailed a hero . . .
. . . and though his replacement (Pence, though don't know if it's always automatically the vice who steps in) may not seem a favourable alternative, at least he might have a clue what the holy hell he's doing and not chuck his toys out of his pram every five minutes.