Marc P
Monday 12th January 2015 12:12pm
17,698 posts
Hi Lazzard really liked this. Was the flow question a deliberate pun??? Lol. My only take was that it reads to me at least a little overcorrected. I would try and hide the directions in more flowing prose if that makes sense. To be honest though a short film is a different beast, but for people coming to it fresh I personally would look at the stage directions. The jump to the outside door is a bit sharp as well, slightly disorientating. Some other visual clue to time passing before that shot. Also I would look at the image system within the piece, maybe have some element of water in every scene. It's raining for example when he is outside his front door. Maybe the rain is threatening to diaphanousise his neighbours shirt. Sex and water. Layer it all in.
And as a footnote ignoring what you ask for - if I was writing it I would probably add a scene in the bath at the end with Sam and David, no dialogue probably rather than the bubble with the blood.
I have the camera to make it if you have the bath! lol
I am going to make a short - soon. So well done for posting - very motivating!
Another technical point. Lose the cost and time etc of an additional set up by having the neighbours scenes set in the kitchen. The coming in drying her hands etc seems a little contrived. But then you lose the surprise element I guess, maybe have part of the kitchen neutral, so we don;t know where we are... we hear running water etc. Then the turn to reveal and the explanation. Maybe misdirect the audience with totally innocent conversation that they think the women are going to take a bath together. I thought that was the idea you were heading to when David and Toby were looking at the neighbour AND a friend. I know she is there so the neighbour can articulate but make her work as well and use her to layer the experience as it were.