Quote: Frankie Rage @ November 15, 2007, 12:42 AMApparently, they've let him out early as he was missing the kids...
I actually LOL at that, well done.
It was only a minor offence anyway 
Langham, can we forgive him? Page 9
Wow. That could go really well or really badly.
I vote well.
I still don't think you should go to prison for downloading pictures of anything.
I think I agree.
They're coming.
Delete!!
Quote from Union president Ben Tansey
"We were recommended Chris Langham and we thought he was a very respected figure in his profession being a Bafta winner.
Really?!
"I know some people might have a few reservations but he has served his time in jail.
Oh, so a paedophile who serves his time can be allowed to live unchecked, can he?
He's not a paedophile.
Anyway, they've had a BNP leader give a talk there already. Which is worse?
(Is this a suitable Harry Hill fight moment? no?)
They're here!
Quote: Godot Taxis @ April 18 2008, 7:26 PM BSTThey're here!
Poltergeist
Quote: zooo @ April 18 2008, 7:25 PM BSTHe's not a paedophile.
Anyway, they've had a BNP leader give a talk there already. Which is worse?
(Is this a suitable Harry Hill fight moment? no?)
zooo, didn't mean to infer he was a paedophile, just used a paedophile as an example. And, he is worse!
I'm just one of those sad blokes who despises anything/one that causes or condones harm and/or sufering to children, and says so.
That's all good.
But... a BNP leader, whose every value I detest, is immeasurably worse than a man who looked at a couple of pictures. Whatever the pictures were of.
Still, I'm not sure if you were saying Langham was worse, or 'a paedophile' was worse...
Quote: zooo @ April 18 2008, 7:36 PM BSTThat's all good.
But... a BNP leader, whose every value I detest, is immeasurably worse than a man who looked at a couple of pictures. Whatever the pictures were of.
WOW! That's me and you sworn enemies then! Shame.
Quote: zooo @ April 18 2008, 7:36 PM BSTThat's all good.
But... a BNP leader, whose every value I detest, is immeasurably worse than a man who looked at a couple of pictures. Whatever the pictures were of.
Still, I'm not sure if you were saying Langham was worse, or 'a paedophile' was worse...
Of course a paedophile, but I meant Mr Langham is worse.
Which doesn't help our relationship, really.
Oh man, another wedding called off!
I'm trying to keep it light, honest! But seriously? A man who has never touched a child in his life is worse than a man who believes that some races are inferior to others?
I'm not being argumentative by the way, I'm just genuinely intrigued.