Steven. He's my favourite character!
Speaking of squirrels (well I was on the last page) I keep almost writing Chris Packham, instead of Langham.
Poor innocent animal bothering Packham.
Langham, can we forgive him? Page 17
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:30 PM BSTAre you scared for some strange reason MLewis?
I am scared of arguing with you. You pay no regard to the things you have already stated. That, added to your already excitable attitude makes you almost impossible to argue with, sensibly.
Go away MLewis. You are a Rambler. We are talking gay now. Byeeeeeee.
I do not want Steven to leave. He is a pshyco. I want him to kill Ian.
He has been near Stacey now though. 
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:30 PM BSTIf some guy was zooming in on my particular child & getting off on it I would kill him.
one last shot.....i thought "inform the police" was your prefer approach here?
Ahhh But he wasnt taking pictures was he.
Of my kids in their swimwear. Infront of me, while my children were just enjoying a normal family day out. You might not care about what happens with your kids pictures but I do. I also think a majority of parents will agree with me & the geezer taking the pictures would be going for a nice long dip in the pool.
Now shutup. You have your opinions & fair enough. I have mine.
Lets not have a verbal punch up anymore.
My fingers are sore. Maybe I will start sniffing the keyboard, like you suggested.
You are quite right Charley. According to your hypothetical situation he wasn't taking pictures......but his was having a wank so i guess that explains it.
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:00 PM BSTIf all else failed & I could not move & I saw him wanking his cock while my son played I would inform the police.
I would still inform the police. Ever heard of the saying "I am going to kill him" "I could of killed him". It's a thought not an action. I was under the impression thoughts are okay in these instances.
Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 7:49 PM BSTYou are quite right Charley. According to your hypothetical situation he wasn't taking pictures......but his was having a wank so i guess that explains it.
What a filthy Bastard he is. He deserves to be shot.
now now....you aren't really going to make me link to all the posts where is said "kill them? you cant be serious" and you said it very clear terms that you were?
Lets just agree that your reactions were a little overzealous and you were caught up in the heat of the moment.
Give it a rest, M.
Oh for god sake.
Yes I said it. Did I do it.
I would Kill in those hypothetical instances. I would murder, beat, shoot, mame, decapitate & maybe even eat. OK.
So what!!!!!
I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION A THOUGHT WAS OK & AN ACTION WAS NOT. I HAVE COMMITED ONLY A THOUGHT MURDER.
I am going to watch eastenders. Your Right MLewis, I am wrong. I am the only person on the planet who would consider killing anyone in those circumstances. What a wicked witch I am.
Your the best, I am the worst.
Is there a plague of men masturbating in public places? Sounds more like a job for the army, then the police.
Maybe even Batman?
Quote: sootyj @ April 28 2008, 8:01 PM BSTSounds more like a job for the army, then (sic) the police.
You dont think the army could cope? 
I dunno there's only a 100,000 of them and they've got Iraq, Kosovo and all that. There could be legions of willy wavers, maybe some undercover, like Al Quaeda with stiffies.
I suppose the RAF could bomb public swimming pools, schools. Granted a lot of kids would be killed, but worth it in the end.
Or we could kill every one over the age of 16?
Fortunately I'm to ignorant to ever be truly insulted.
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 6:13 PM BSTIf it is acceptable for a man to stand at the school gates & wank while watching the kiddies come out, then I will bow down to this argument. Someone give me a reasonable explanation as to how that is acceptable, then fine. He isnt touching any kiddies, they may not even know he is doing it. Is it acceptable though. Is it ok?
If they don't know he's doing it (so not literally standing at the gate), then yeah, I don't see a problem. No one's getting harmed. This hypothetical man could just as easily fantasise about the kids he sees with their Mums in ASDA on a Wednesday evening, then masturbate at home. No one's getting hurt. It's all in his own mind.
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 6:30 PM BST
To the first bit.
If it was a male member (no pun intended) rather than zooo who'd said that, would you still be lol-ing?
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 6:30 PM BSTI would happily kill & go to prison for anyone that hurt them in any way.
But the whole argument is that, in this hypothetical situation, they weren't hurt. Where's the consistency in your argument Charley?
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 6:31 PM BSTWhat the f**k does a school play have to do with pedophillia. You silly man.
paedophilia*
Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 6:35 PM BSTAhh, so if your kids were clothed you wouldnt kill the people?
School events often restrict cameras because of parents like you who are worried than images will end up on the net being wanked over by weirdos. You are what Brass Eye was invested for!
to both points.
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 6:35 PM BSTIf I was made aware, that some guy was wanking off to my kids pictures, I would automaticaly assume my boys could be in danger. That there MAY come a point when the pictures would not be sufficient & the pull of the actual child will be greater. Then as a MOTHER my instict would kick in. To protect my child at any cost.
I'm not certain that their mother being a murderer wouldn't be more damaging than what you say you're trying to protect them from, or avenge!
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 6:46 PM BSTAre you saying that a child has to be naked to be demoralised?
In some kind of compromising position, yes.
Quote: sootyj @ April 28 2008, 6:49 PM BSTn.b. I am handing my self into the Police today, I watched Heat, and Reservoir Dogs.
I was excited, and stimulated by the idea of guys in black suits with guns shooting up banks.
As I am completely incapable of controlling myself, I am obviously going to get a gun, and a black suit, and shoot up my local HSBC.
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:10 PM BSTActually I did not say that at all.
I said if anyone hurt my boys I would kill them. You should learn to read.
Sorry Charley. You might not have meant it, but that's exactly what you DID say.
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:21 PM BST
I would. We were talking about the Langham case.
If some c**t had abused my child & put those images on the internet for other sadistic arseholes to get off on. I would kill them. I would kill the person who abused my child & the person getting off on it.How would I know if an innocent pic of my son in his schoiol uniform was getting some fella off. I would'nt. However if by some miracle it was discovered. IE I caught him sat in a chair rubbing his hard cock all over my young sons photo I would still kill him.
... And again, arguing against what you said, and then saying it again in the final sentence! >_<
Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 7:28 PM BSTThen your kids went to some pretty rough swimming lessons.
ROFL.
Quote: zooo @ April 28 2008, 7:41 PM BSTSpeaking of squirrels (well I was on the last page) I keep almost writing Chris Packham, instead of Langham.
Poor innocent animal bothering Packham.
Never liked him. *looks around suspiciously*
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:43 PM BSTGo away MLewis. You are a Rambler.
Good Lord... *shakes head*
Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:54 PM BSTI would still inform the police. Ever heard of the saying "I am going to kill him" "I could of killed him". It's a thought not an action. I was under the impression thoughts are okay in these instances.
(have*)
Quote: sootyj @ April 28 2008, 8:01 PM BSTMaybe even Batman?
Or Fapman?
... And I'm aware that half of the points I raised were brought up further down the page. 