Quote: SimonWing @ September 17 2012, 11:42 PM BSTHowever, 'Kall' sucked so hard (see signature), that his clusterf**k actually became brilliant as a result.
?????? Sorry. Incomprehensible.
What ever happened to critique? Page 12
Quote: keewik @ September 17 2012, 11:59 PM BST?????? Sorry. Incomprehensible.
Quote: SimonWing @ September 18 2012, 12:03 AM BSThttps://www.comedy.co.uk/forums/thread/25309/
Which was shit.
Still don't get your point. Maybe a simple explanation would help.
Quote: keewik @ September 18 2012, 12:08 AM BSTWhich was shit.
Still don't get your point. Maybe a simple explanation would help.
I was merely stating that occasionally someone's work can so structurally awful, that the work actually becomes quite amusing/enjoyable in a train-wreck kind of way.
I know I wasn't the only one who enjoyed that thread, but clearly you didn't, so let's leave it at that before your 'condescending tone level' goes off the readable scale.
Quote: SimonWing @ September 18 2012, 12:16 AM BSTI was merely stating that occasionally someone's work can so structurally awful, that the work actually becomes quite amusing/enjoyable in a train-wreck kind of way.
I know I wasn't the only one who enjoyed that thread, but clearly you didn't, so let's leave it at that before your 'condescending tone level' goes off the readable scale.
Temper, temper, sonny! How's that for condescending?
Quote: keewik @ September 18 2012, 12:28 AM BSTTemper, temper, sonny! How's that for condescending?
A noble effort.
Quote: keewik @ September 18 2012, 12:28 AM BSTTemper, temper, sonny! How's that for condescending?
(Will triple check all grammar after reading that in keewik's accent. Thoroughly told off in advance for any future mistakes)
(NB random ramblings in my dodgy accent don't count!)
Something like Rabb C Nesbitt on QI?
Quote: SimonWing @ September 18 2012, 12:16 AM BSTI was merely stating that occasionally someone's work can so structurally awful, that the work actually becomes quite amusing/enjoyable in a train-wreck kind of way.
I know I wasn't the only one who enjoyed that thread, but clearly you didn't, so let's leave it at that before your 'condescending tone level' goes off the readable scale.
Sorry, Simon. Didn't mean to be condescending - I wasn't feeling great yesterday and totally missed the point. But you're right in that I didn't care for Kall's postings. I read the first 2 and marvelled at their awfulness but then I found it boring and thought it was just a wind-up.
Quote: sootyj @ September 18 2012, 6:50 AM BSTSomething like Rabb C Nesbitt on QI?
Stop dissing my brother! 
Quote: keewik @ September 18 2012, 8:47 AM BSTSorry, Simon. Didn't mean to be condescending - I wasn't feeling great yesterday and totally missed the point. But you're right in that I didn't care for Kall's postings. I read the first 2 and marvelled at their awfulness but then I found it boring and thought it was just a wind-up.
I was in a crappy mood too. No worries mate.
Actually, when Kall's name went grey on us, I tried to finish the story. If it was a wind-up, it is actually really difficult to write that horribly. There is a certain skill to it.
That said, it's impossible to tell if it is real or not.
There is an internet law called "Poe's Law", where no (especially religious) fundementalist/extremist internet opinion is too extreme to be potentially genuine; due to the level of insanity that exists in the extremists. Thus, on the internet, it is impossible to tell a genuine extremist from an imposter.
In this twist, there are so many complete imbeciles on the internet, that no script is too retarded to be potentially genuine. To be honest, I really hope it was genuine, because it was immense.
If Kall was a fake, it was possibly Roodeye, which would account for Kall being banned. It would take someone with Roodeye's skill & temperament to be a fake Kall.
I've just read Kall's Script 2 for the first time and I thought it was hilarious.
Mind you I haven't been around these boards much lately so I haven't read any of his other posts. To me, though, it was genius. Like EastEnders or something condensed into 30 seconds, I believe I wrote on the Script 2 thread.
Just read Torch Script. I think it's brilliant!
I don't know if this has been covered because there are so many post to read I have read lots of them but not all.
I have found it a little confusing between critique and showcase, for me at least because I make videos, and I wouldn't call them a showcase, but they are finished ( I barely get chance to film them once let alone film them again)
I would like to put them in critique, because that's what I want people to do to them, so then I would learn as time goes on.
But I have to put them in showcase because they are finished, and then because they are in showcase nobody critiques them and I make the same mistakes over and over again.
But all in all I have found this forum a very good place to get feedback, so well done guys either way I like it here.
If you want feedback it's fine to put a video in Critique.
Thanks Zooo, I will do next time, I might have to take a screen shot of this in case I get acossted and told off, or I might regret it and start putting them back in showcase. 