British Comedy Guide

The Sitcom Mission 2012 Page 18

Linda Aronson (who wrote Screenwriting Updated) points out that the creative mind is not proactive, but reactive. And it reacts to triggers. More (and more varied) triggers will result in more ideas.

In practice this means that if I say 'write a joke'. You have nothing to work with. No triggers means you're trying to make something out of nothing and you'll find it very hard to write a joke.

If I say 'write a joke about a Mexican'. You have one trigger, and you'll write some jokes.

If I say 'write a joke about a Mexican narcoleptic' you'll write even more jokes-because you have more triggers.

If I say 'write a joke about a Mexican narcoleptic continuity announcer' it gets even easier because your reactive imagination has lots to work with. You're not staring at a blank computer screen hoping that your imagination will proactively find something for you.

So here's a challenge to all you insomniacs:what can you do with the triggers we've been given?

Namely:

A large fat pheasant (Deceased of course).

A dildo (combined with a 'loud buzzing' sound effect.

A fishing rod.

Go on. You know you want to.

Only one of them doesn't smell of fish.

I hope I don't get kicked off the forum for that one, Bernard Manning lives within.

So here's a challenge to all you insomniacs:what can you do with the triggers we've been given?

Namely:

A large fat pheasant (Deceased of course).

A dildo (combined with a 'loud buzzing' sound effect.

A fishing rod.

Go on. You know you want to.[/quote]

Sounds like a feature from the quickly pulled John Craven vehicle - 'Countryfile uncut'

I dunno about the rod, the dildo, and the bird, but I've named the Narcoleptic Mexican 'Sleepy Gonzales'.

Quote: Feeoree @ November 20 2011, 11:25 AM GMT

I dunno about the rod, the dildo, and the bird, but I've named the Narcoleptic Mexican 'Sleepy Gonzales'.

:D

The rod the dildo and the bird sounds like the new classic threesome to dethrone an Englishman, an Irishman and a Scotsman or a priest, a vicar and a rabbi.

So, a rod a dildo and a bird walk into a bar...

Quote: simon wright @ November 20 2011, 1:55 PM GMT

So, a rod a dildo and a bird walk into a bar...

... is an extract from a long-forgotten Rod Hull and Emu porn film.

Quote: Mr Ashdown @ November 20 2011, 1:57 PM GMT

... is an extract from a long-forgotten Rod Hull and Emu porn film.

Entitled?? Best suggestion wins a copy of that festive favourite; Richard Dawkins wrapping his tonsils around A Little Drummer Boy.

Matron.

Here's a link for you all to pilot scripts that actually got made in the States. This'll keep you going over Christmas.

http://sites.google.com/site/tvwriting/us-comedy/pilot-scripts

And the Dildo says, 'So what did you think a Mexican kept under his hat?'

Sorry, I thought you said large fat peasant....

David Fynn played the groom in last week's Life's Too Short, as well as Manfred in Pete vs Life. Here's an interview with him:

https://www.comedy.co.uk/sitcom_mission/blog/34/

I'm about to finish my episode and one idea is to end on a cliffhanger which is addressed/resolved in the next episode. Is this a bit of a cop out?

Quote: richiemoomoo @ November 23 2011, 9:07 PM GMT

I'm about to finish my episode and one idea is to end on a cliffhanger which is addressed/resolved in the next episode. Is this a bit of a cop out?

I'm totally certain the answer to that is...

Sorry to pre-empt the announcement, but I happened to check out the blog and read the 'Thunderer' script.

Fantastic stuff - almost every line is a great joke...in some cases 3 or 4!

Quote: Frantically @ November 23 2011, 9:55 PM GMT

Sorry to pre-empt the announcement, but I happened to check out the blog and read the 'Thunderer' script.

Fantastic stuff - almost every line is a great joke...in some cases 3 or 4!

Made us laugh out loud when we read it.

For those who were lucky enough to see the shows it was superbly performed, too.

Quote: richiemoomoo @ November 23 2011, 9:07 PM GMT

I'm about to finish my episode and one idea is to end on a cliffhanger which is addressed/resolved in the next episode. Is this a bit of a cop out?

I'd love to be in the audience for that live show.

In answer to Rich's question:

It looks as though you're placing your sitcom on the 'soap opera' end of the spectrum, with a series-long story arc in place. In which case, it's fine to leave certain threads dangling which will create intrigue for next week's episode.

However, 'this week's episode' specific storyline will need to be tied up.

Hope that helps

Cheers, Declan

Share this page