British Comedy Guide

Old Masters

Wave We all know how this works by now.

I think it's a good area but not sure if I'm coming at it the right way.

INT. 17TH CENTURY ARTIST'S STUDIO. TWO FINE ARTISTS (ARTIST 1 & ARTIST 2)
ARE BUSILY PAINTING AT THEIR EASELS.

ARTIST 2 GETS UP AND LOOKS OVER ARTIST 1'S SHOULDER AT HIS PAINTING.

ARTIST 1 PROTECTIVELY PUTS HIS ARM OVER THE CANVAS LIKE A SCHOOL CHILD.

ARTIST 1;
Hey! No copying.

ARTIST 2:
I'm not not copying. Anyway portraits was my idea. I thought of it first.

ARTIST 1:
Tut. Yeah right.

ARTIST 2 TRIES USING SOME OF HIS PENS. NONE OF THEM WORK.

ARTIST 1:
That's what happens when you don't put the lids back on.

ARTIST 2 RIFLES THROUGH HIS PENCIL CASE

ARTIST 2:
Can I borrow your highlighters?

ARTIST 1:
You've got you own!

ARTIST 2:
I've only got pink and orange.

ARTIST 1:
Go on then but put the lid on the other end so you don't forget, ok?

ARTIST 2 STARTS USING THE HIGHLIGHTER MARKERS.

SFX: SQUEAKING

ARTIST 1: (CONT)
Don't push the nib up.

ARTIST 2:
I wasn't pressing hard.

ARTIST 1:
Of course not, all pens have a mouse in them. Have you still got my black?

ARTIST 2:
No I gave it back ages ago.

ARTIST 1 FINDS THE PEN. IT HAS NO LID

ARTIST 1:
Argh.

ARTIST 2:
Sorry.

ARTIST 1:
Yeah. Brilliant.

ARTIST 2:
You can use this if you want.

HE HANDS HIM A PEN.

ARTIST 1:
It's a Biro.

ARTIST 2:
Yeah but look, there's a picture of a maiden on the side and when you turn it upside down.

TURNS PEN UPSIDE DOWN.

ARTIST 2:
See?

ARTIST 1:
Wow, You can see her Smock!

ARTIST 2:
My brother's got one where you it goes all the way.

ARTIST 1:
Really?

ARTIST 2:
Yeah you actually get to see her corset.

END.

Nice idea and the dialogue works well. I think it's looking for a punchline though.

Looking is a bit of an understatement. At moment it's stumbling through a forest with no torch screaming where are you?

How about the model is the Mona Lisa doing a porn shoot?

I usually like your stuff, but this is not doing much for me. For most of the sketch there is nothing that relies on them being 17th Century artists, it is just two people behaving childishly with 17th century sets and costumes, and I am not sure that is enough. The overly modest novelty pen is fun, but considering that this was the era of Rubens fleshy nudes, I am not sure the gag works with the chosen historical setting.

Quote: Timbo @ January 19 2010, 11:03 PM GMT

I usually like your stuff, but this is not doing much for me. For most of the sketch there is nothing that relies on them being 17th Century artists, it is just two people behaving childishly with 17th century sets and costumes, and I am not sure that is enough. The overly modest novelty pen is fun, but considering that this was the era of Rubens fleshy nudes, I am not sure the gag works with the chosen historical setting.

Yep. I think the idea amused me more than the end result. Cheers Timbo, Some very good points well made. Think I'll try again.

Timbo makes some good points. The dialogue felt slightly clunky to me, but it always does when I read at this hour...

It's obvious what you're trying to do (not in a bad way) but this sketch hasn't worked. I'd go back to the drawing board with it. ;)

Quote: Leevil @ January 20 2010, 2:38 AM GMT

It's obvious what you're trying to do (not in a bad way) but this sketch hasn't worked. I'd go back to the drawing board with it. ;)

Laughing out loud

I'd echo the above.

Share this page