British Comedy Guide

Sitcom (Com)Mission Page 19

I tend to write one episode of a sitcom, then jot down loads of notes/plans/gag/storylines for the rest of the series, so I (and potential takers) know how it will generally pan out, and that it's got legs.

What we get a lot of at the workshops is writers who have written one episode and given no thought whatever to another 5. After a reading we ask the other writers there to suggest storylines based on what they've just heard. Obviously if the premise, relationships and conflicts are clear this should be relatively easy. If nobody can think of anything then clearly you're in trouble.

You'd be amazed how little thought some people give to whether their sitcom has legs. I wouldn't be surprised if we got a two-hander in which one of the characters dies at the end of episode one.

I take your point, but there are writers who don't really know what the plot of further episodes will be until they sit down and start to write them. If a pilot episode is sufficiently strong is establishing interesting characters and an initial premise, then there is no reason that (a minimum of) another five episodes should not be possible.

Writing five outline further outline plots may sound like almost an essential way to plan for a series, but actually that can be the very point that anything original in the pilot goes out of the window and a sitcom becomes formulaic. The plots should come from the characters and if the writer(s) know their characters then an initial seed for a plot will germinate from something within those characters.

Some of the best plots come from the most innocuous initial idea which a writer will run with and see where it goes. I'm not saying that plotting out episodes is a terrible idea, but I think that if the writer sitting down to script an episode doesn't initially know where the story is going, then it's more likely to end up in a script which surprises the audience as well.

I would cite I'm Alan Partridge as the type of show where one can sense that the plots developed organically during the writing process. I personally prefer sitcom where it isn't obvious how the episodes have been constructed.

Saying "in episode two, X gets seen kissing Z by Y, thereby leading to..." or "X needs to find money to pay for a romantic dinner with Y, so he goes and finds a job doing..." et cetera, tends to lead to comedy-by-numbers. Plotting is a consideration, but it is a mistake to think that writing the pilot is the easy bit because it's just one story. The whole focus of a show and any future plots is set-up within that pilot (if you're doing it right).

Quote: simon wright @ November 20 2009, 11:30 AM GMT

I wouldn't be surprised if we got a two-hander in which one of the characters dies at the end of episode one.

Laughing out loud

I suspect Tim and Simon you'd be in agreement if you met over a pint.

I think all Simon's saying is "please send us a sitcom that actually is a sitcom", not an extended sketch or a one-act play. One way of ensuring that your sitcom works as a sitcom would be to write more episodes or at least think them up. But it's also quite possible I would think to produce something "with legs" without doing that, as long as you're properly thinking about the piece as a sitcom while you write the pilot. Personally I think that writing extra material, whether that's just exploratory scenes about your characters, other story ideas, or complete episodes, is all good and as has been said, feeds back into the main script.

Are you going to have a go at this, Tim?

Totally agree with you, Tim.

i just get frustrated with some writers who send us a script that has no future episodes
implicit in the episode they've sent us. At all. Ever. The 'it's a two-hander and one of them dies' scenario.

Agree about Partridge, too. Which is my all-time favourite sitcom btw.

Quote: simon wright @ November 20 2009, 1:50 PM GMT

The 'it's a two-hander and one of them dies' scenario.

I thought Randall and Hopkirk Deceased was great...

Quote: simon wright @ November 20 2009, 1:50 PM GMT

Agree about Partridge, too. Which is my all-time favourite sitcom btw.

Partridge is genius. Which series is your favourite, Simon?

Cheers Simon and Griff,

No, I'm in complete agreement about the dead-end nature of some pilot scripts, because they have been written basically as mini plays as opposed to sitcom episode ones. My point was really only about the way one approaches writing episode 2 onwards.

(Series one of Partridge is the better written, relying less on Coogan's performance, IMO. ;))

Partridge is genius. Which series is your favourite, Simon?

Tricky. I think I'll have to go and watch all of 'em now just to check. Even the last series had moments of genius. The episode where Alan impales his foot on a spike then has to give a speech while vomiting is painfully funny, but as Tim says, leans heavily on Coogan's brillance.

Thought your precis of our arguments was superb, Griff. I can't make the drinks on the 12th (workshop the following day in Manchester) but let me know when you're next down and we must all have a drink. Can even put you up providing you a) have no objection to bedding down in a slum
and
b) can put up with my neighbours and their all night crapmusicathon.

Sorry, I may have drifted off topic here...

Quote: Griff @ November 20 2009, 1:46 PM GMT

Are you going to have a go at this, Tim?

I don't really have anything suitable at the moment which isn't already out in production company land, so no. But from what I've seen and heard, it's a great scheme and more power to its elbow. Best of luck to all those who are though.

I'm working on a sitcom treatment and material for a Radio 4 pilot sketch show at the moment (with a deadline already on the horizon), so I've enough on my plate... :(

Simon - I will definitely catch up for a drink sometime. Good choice of Partridge episode. I think my favourite is probably the one where he gets attacked by farmers while filming the narrowboat holiday promo.

We've just got back from a workshop in Leeds. A long way to go, but if it uncovers a script then it was very much worth it.

Next London workshop is on Nov 28th.

S

PS I know it's probably not done to edit your own posts like this, but we've just had an email describing the Leeds workshop as 'massively inspirational'.

That keeps you going a lot more than the £40 does.

Though that helps, of course...

Quote: simon wright @ November 23 2009, 9:54 AM GMT

we've just had an email describing the Leeds workshop as 'massively inspirational'.

That keeps you going a lot more than the £40 does.

Though that helps, of course...

Image

How the hell did you do that? And where did you get hold of my Spotlight photo?

Quote: simon wright @ November 23 2009, 6:31 PM GMT

How the hell did you do that?

Trade secret. But I can tell you I got paid £40 to do it.

Quote: simon wright @ November 23 2009, 6:31 PM GMT

And where did you get hold of my Spotlight photo?

Well, I was watching Mikey Jackson and Tim Walker performing a 'Two Hander' in a Gay Bar/Theatre. It was given out as a flyer for 'Up and Coming Productions'. I must admit I doctored it a bit. Here's the original flyer:

Image

Well, I was watching Mikey Jackson and Tim Walker performing a 'Two Hander' in a Gay Bar/Theatre

You were there?????? :O

Come on, be honest, be honest. Was I convincing? :D

Quote: Morrace @ November 23 2009, 7:26 PM GMT

Well, I was watching Mikey Jackson and Tim Walker performing a 'Two Hander' in a Gay Bar/Theatre.

Quote: Mikey Jackson @ November 23 2009, 9:43 PM GMT

You were there?????? :O

Come on, be honest, be honest. Was I convincing? :D

I should say so. When Tim Walker (playing Denis Nielsen) whispered in your ear, "Trust me, Im a doctor.." - the look on your face (playing an aged rent-boy) made me believe he actually was a doctor!

Well done! (and you were).

Share this page