Quote: Ben @ January 2 2011, 10:17 PM GMTHard evidence?
I assume the pictures are used a masturbationary aids, as they fetch a high price with the local homeless.
I've just seen... Page 102
Quote: Gavin @ January 2 2011, 10:19 PM GMTI assume the pictures are used a masturbationary aids, as they fetch a high price with the local homeless.
Moonstone?
Quote: Ben @ January 2 2011, 10:22 PM GMTMoonstone?
Bless him.
Quote: Matthew Stott @ January 2 2011, 9:40 PM GMTI couldn't really see what the fuss was about that. Seemed to get a lot of rave reviews, but seemed pretty average to me.
It was an engrossing story, well told, with interesting characters you cared about. Could have lost twenty minutes from the running time, but then so could most films.
Quote: chipolata @ January 2 2011, 11:31 PM GMTIt was an engrossing story, well told, with interesting characters you cared about.
Well yes, to those who liked it I suppose it had all those things; I was just left underwhelmed, especially after seeing all the great reviews. Seemed more like a TV thing than a movie. I think Fincher could do a better job.
I saw Walle on iPlayer yesterday
It was aces
I've got it taped
& Shall watch it after Bee Movie.
Storm Warning. Generic yuppies-terrorised-by-inbred-yokels horror movie that wimps out of the "final girl" ending these type of films usually have.
watched Shrek Happy Ever After tonight. Not as good as the other films, but fairly delightful. Of course I loved any bits involving the cat. I even did a little cry. But I cry at most things.
I just can't warm to the Shrek movies. Even the good early ones.
I do like that cat, but not so much the films.
Yeah, I'm not a fan either. They have their moments but it's nothing special.
Guy Ritchie's Rock N Rolla. Oh dear.
I'm looking forward to going to see The Kings Speech.
So is Charles.