Attention all moon landing sceptics Page 20

Quote: sootyj @ July 22 2009, 12:19 PM BST

Where as Tim maybe slowly winning me round on the 9/11 one.

View original

If there's one book that I would recommend to someone such as yourself, who is able to evaluate properly cited evidence, it would be the book by David Ray Griffin. He goes through the 9/11 Commission Report with a fine tooth-comb and cites compelling officially sourced and reference rebuttal evidence...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/1566565847/comedyguide-21/

(At the bottom of this page is also mentioned Michael Ruppert's excellent 'Crossing The Rubricon', a more general text about the end of Oil, the Middle East and CIA policy.)

Quote: SlagA @ July 22 2009, 12:31 PM BST

Apols. I should have put a smilie there.

Yes, but if they're recieving signals from space (just like the rehearsals they run in the prior months via the TETR-A satellite) how are they to know whether the capsule is manned or not? To all intents, it would appear to be so, wouldn't it?

View original

That assumes the conspirators are smarter than the actual people working there which I doubt. And why bother?

Besides if you look at SDI as a genuine attempt to fake a space program you'll see how leaky the whole thing is.

Quote: Tim Walker @ July 22 2009, 12:33 PM BST

If there's one book that I would recommend to someone such as yourself, who is able to evaluate properly cited evidence, it would be the book by David Ray Griffin. He goes through the 9/11 Commission Report with a tooth-comb and cites compelling officially sourced and reference rebuttal evidence...

View original

The thing that swung me was reading about the comission. Many of the members wanted to resign and there were constant complaints about evidence being mislaid.

I always say look to the human factor then beyond.

That and building 7, that's just weird.

Quote: sootyj @ July 22 2009, 12:34 PM BST

That assumes the conspirators are smarter than the actual people working there which I doubt. And why bother?

View original

Not really. The satellite was put in place. How could the ground staff then tell the difference between the rehearsal and the real event?

And re: 9/11 - you mean to say you've been debunking it all this time, without researching it?
Double

Here's a list

JFK
Bobby Kennedy
Roswell
Martin Luther King
Moon landings
Princess Diana
9/11
7/7

All have conspiracy thories (there are probably more but my small brain can't think of any) but none have been proved. Are governments that good at keeping secrets? On the evidence of the leaks that occur on a regular basis I would think not.

Research yes but pointed me in a direction of new data.

And how would they have handled the info from the Astronauts? Was it prerecorded? Or sent live from Earth?

Slagg are you seriously suggesting that no one noticed broadcasts sent to the satellite to be sent back to earth?

Quote: roscoff @ July 22 2009, 12:44 PM BST

Here's a list

JFK
Bobby Kennedy
Roswell
Martin Luther King
Moon landings
Princess Diana
9/11
7/7

All have conspiracy thories (there are probably more but my small brain can't think of any) but none have been proved. Are governments that good at keeping secrets? On the evidence of the leaks that occur on a regular basis I would think not.

View original

I actually believed the world was destroyed by a nuclear exchange after the Cuban missile crisis. Everyone on the planet is an actor taking part in the conspiracy.

Re this TETR-A satellite: Was this satellite on the moon or in orbit around the moon, or was it a typical Earth-orbiting satellite? Because as someone who has tracked literally thousands of satellites in his lifetime I can categorically state that it would be impossible for anyone involved in the tracking of a non-lunar satellite to be deceived into thinking he/she was communicating with a spacecraft on the moon. That alone would add hundreds of people to the conspirators list.

Quote: DaButt @ July 22 2009, 12:48 PM BST

Re this TETR-A satellite: Was this satellite on the moon or in orbit around the moon, or was it a typical Earth-orbiting satellite? Because as someone who has tracked literally thousands of satellites in his lifetime I can categorically state that it would be impossible for anyone involved in the tracking of a non-lunar satellite to be deceived into thinking he/she was communicating with a spacecraft on the moon. That alone would add hundreds of people to the conspirators list.

View original

There I can agree. But don't tell anyone, it's a secret.

After a while it's more complicated to fake the landing then send some one in the first place.

How do we know Columbus landed on America?

Quote: sootyj @ July 22 2009, 1:01 PM BST

After a while it's more complicated to fake the landing then send some one in the first place.

How do we know Columbus landed on America?

View original

Because they made the Carry On film. Carry On films never lie

Oh Roscoff, every one knows they were all filmed in the middle of Winter in Wales.

Actually didn't you ever bump into any of the actors?

Quote: roscoff @ July 22 2009, 1:04 PM BST

Because they made the Carry On film. Carry On films never lie

View original

Carry On Up The Khyber is the only thing you need to see to understand the British Empire's role in India, IMO.

Other than Ghandi and Goodness Gracious Me.

Quote: sootyj @ July 22 2009, 1:06 PM BST

Oh Roscoff, every one knows they were all filmed in the middle of Winter in Wales.

Actually didn't you ever bump into any of the actors?

View original

I was Barbara Windsor's stunt double

Oh dear so when I, it was you, I was thinking of when I...

I think I look pretty good in this scene.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATDJe87hia0