sootyj
Wednesday 1st June 2011 11:32am
51,287 posts
Ok let's start at the beginning. Dr Who is stuck in a creative paradigm, unconvincing action vs an unconvincing peril.
Why don't the Daleks just kill him, how come running up a corridor gets you out of any kind of peril. So Gaiman takes the idea of what happens if you remove the peril and the action? The result the story in Who is revealed for the first time in decades.
The monster in this case, big bad what ever is utterly improbable pointless. So the question becomes how does the Dr deal with utter loneliness? He chases a distress signal and finds a grave yard.
The bitter twist being he is not alone, but will never be able to talk to or hold his love. A man alone, but not alone for all eternity.
The Amy subplot really isn't about her running down a corridor. That's just window dressing and of course the big bad could have killed her at any time. It's a similee she is trapped in the Tardis abandoned by the Dr and forever pursued by a terrifying Rory or her guilt at being unable to protect or commit to him.
The limp action plot is a little bit of window dressing to a far more powerful psychodrama enacted within.
But most people seem to eat the wrapper and throw the burger away.
And it that way I pity them.