swerytd
Wednesday 18th April 2007 1:19pm [Edited]
Guildford
7,542 posts
I don't want to piss on anyone/everyone's bonfire here but how about treating this a bit more like the commissioning process amongst ourselves.
What I mean is start right from scratch. Write six pilots in twos/threes/groups and a synopsis for a six episode series. *Then* we vote on which one's the best and every partnership gets an episode to write.
Write a synopsis for each pilot (3-4 pages) detailing *exactly* what happens then me and SlagA (if he doesn't mind) will edit/review/suggest stuff at that stage so the story is a) funny and b) makes logical sense.
Then teams go away and write pilots.
Editors comment and rewrites (ad infinitum!)
Post pilots on Critique forum with a voting process from those involved (perhaps those *not* involved voting will be a better indication of how funny/good they are and reduce 'my script is best' syndrome)
Work on best idea with original writers as head script/story editors (to encourage them to 'give up' their original work. You also get a 'Created by' credit and a yay/nay veto on each storyline) in order to develop six (or eight) storylines that, again, get edited at the 3-4 page synopsis and passed back to writers to write episodes.
[Ideas not used at this stage are free to be developed by the writers themselves (with any additional involvement from others on project) if they want to go that way.]
Editors comment and rewrites (ad infinitum again!)
Post episode on Critique forum with same mechanism as before to pick best episode to submit to production companies.
Possible development/filming if no-one production companies are interested using resources around here.
This way we at least have a plan. The main benefit I think is to not to think of it as a way of getting a sitcom commissioned, but thinking of this as an opportunity to develop writing partnerships and gain experience of the process (by gaining more feedback than you would ordinarily/praise/rejection) and who's best at what.
Another benefit is that when writing on your own, it's hard to edit, your jokes aren't funny the 50th time you read them, you lose a sense of purpose, don't adhere to self-set deadlines. This way we're using each other to be honest as to what is/isn't funny, adding perhaps a funnier one-liner than the original, ironing out logical difficulties.
Tell me to piss off if you think it's all bollocks but I think it may be a decent idea. Sorry, but it all seemed a bit 'woolly' up to this point.
Dan