Godot Taxis
Wednesday 11th February 2009 6:28am
5,742 posts
Alright boys!
The XL1 is a good camcorder but it's front heavy - as well as heavy. It's also overkill for what it does. It's USP was that it has interchangeable lenses, but they're so expensive and so specialized that it not really relevant. It makes you feel like a proper filmmaker though.
The PAL version of the XM1 has no analogue in, which means you can't use it for digitising old footage - don't know how important that is , but it's a bit of an oversight. Never used the XM2, but it didn't set the world alight when it came out.
Never used the VX1000, but the VX2000 is a great cam and had very good low light performance. The Canons are traditionally not thought to be very good with imaging red -tend to flare.
Don't know about the HV30, but I wouldn't think it would be much cop - it's not a pro cam. A lot of these consumer cams don't have manual focus - which is an absolute must.
Sony and Panasonic own video imaging in my opinion - I'd steer clear of Canon.
My vote would be for the Panasonic DVX100 - if you can find one. It's not HD (but none of the cams you mentioned are, save HV30) but it's 24p and this will give you a much more film like image than HDV. It's also got a fairly wide zoom and the handling is brilliant.
In the XM1 price range I'd recommend the Panasonic NVMX 300. It's so small you wouldn't think it could cut it, but it outputs better images than the Sony VX2000 and it's got MF, zebra pattern and all the stuff you really need.
The 'one' by the way is the Panasonic HVX200. It's got a full widescreen CCD array, a miniDV deck and card slots, it shoots all the formats and supports proper over and undercranking. It's not even expensive for what it does. Sell your caravan and ultradoll and buy one.