You make a good point about media reactions Deferenz.
Youth knife crime really took off in the early 1990s, before then it was a rarity confined to certain groups in the inner cities. Newman and Baddiel even wrote a sketch about the new phenomenom, making jokes about how they had to pretend that their bus pass holders were knives in their back pockets whenever they came across a group of teenagers.
As I never went to Borstal, I never went to school thinking I would be knifed? Did my teachers ask for stab proof vests? Was I ever worried about being mugged and killed for my trainers? Being punched in the face for my dinner money yes, murdered for personal clothing, no.
The types of violence found on the street have escalated over the last few decades due to the vast amounts of cash that can be made through the drug trade, the formation of gangs as a substitute family unit and the pressure of our consumerist society on young people to acquire expensive goods and name brands. Knives had replaced fists and guns have replaced knives.
The tabloid press was just as salacious in the 1970s and 1980s as it is today. If there had been a vast number of children stabbing each other in the playground, then it would have been reported.
And just to rubbish my argument completely, Deferenz is correct about the influence of the media in this respect. See my earlier diatribe about child molesting being swept under the carpet in the old days. Now, thanks to the press, every parent is worried about their kids being attacked by paedos on a daily basis.
In conclusion: writing my ignorant and biased opinions on Internet message boards is way cooler then ringing up talk radio stations, cuz those people are like, really sad.