ajp29
Friday 23rd March 2007 11:25pm
5,486 posts
In the Russia episode they lampooned friends it was very funny, 'could you be any harder?' My allusion to friends was made because when they get writers together in America they produce mainstream programs, it may be nice to watch, if you like that sort of thing, but it doesn't do anything apart from be commercial, would they have ever tackled annerexia in Friends, i don't think so. its good to see that in this case the group of writers focused on real issues rather than coffee.
If you don't Skins fine, i'm not going to argue its merits because it is what it is. I liked the series and the finale was amazing, i was thinking how would they end it then suddenly Sid starts signing in the toilets genius.I think Ed is right, how are they going to follow it.
I like Stewart Lee (his reunion with Herring at Tedstock on YouTube is brilliant especially when they have a go a Mitchell and Webb) but the point of Skins is that it portrays adults as teenagers and teenagers as adults, thats why Harry Enfield was brought in (its meant to be ironic). Its not meant to be realistic its meant to be fiction which is why everything is a caricature. Lee was as reactionary as those idiots who protested against Jerry Springer the Opera because he had an idea of what shows about teenagers should be before he saw it, in other words he didn't look at it with an open mind.
As for comedy/drama hierachy i can't think of any better ones, This Life, Teachers (first series) are up there but i don't think they beat it.