Returning briefly to the topic of manspreading, the problem with the modern feminist lobby is that they just don't understand the nuances involved. As someone who was raised typically by Victorians, I began life permanently cross legged as well as waiting to be fed the occasional biscuit rather than just grabbing. It was the epitome of politeness. But then, of course, one entered the workplace during the time of Thatcher, Major and Blair. Long gone in most was civil respect, mutual understanding of seniority in work roles and waiting for sex until at least three years into marriage.
Suddenly - and it was a lack of confidence on their part - women of power were exposing their cleavages to show who was boss and male managers who supported them opened their legs wider and wider "challengingly" to minions to the extent that many ended up with severe splits in their arses. Ludicrous as it was, it did the trick. Ultimately they held senior positions because of their bombast rather than any sort of substantial credibility while the rest of us were sufficiently irritated to get out of their offices as quickly as possible in view of the sheer creepiness, thereby never getting promoted.
This is not to say that we weren't on a certain rhythm of transition of our own. It was possibly at the time of the Summer of Love when standing in a Sergio Tacchini shirt alongside people who were so off their heads on e they couldn't have given a toss whether their team won or lost, the journey on the long train home was combined with that thing where while the legs are still crossed the right knee goes much further out so as to form a distinctive v shape. In other words, it was a suitable safe place for retaining the essence of 19th Century manners while reaching out to the cut thrusting ways of money munching modernism, not that we subscribed to them ourselves, preferring to ask "and what can I give you?".
Subsequently our people became ones in which the legs were not crossed but opened to what was deemed a reasonable extent so long as the hands were crossed in front of the crotch while we were protecting any embarrassment in our faces by eating a dozen or so Garibaldis straight out of the packet without the use of hands. But, and this is the crucial point, I for one was not prepared to go the whole hog not because of my history - I miss the 1910s so much now it is almost as if I wasn't there - but a normal unwillingness to need arse mending surgery. Consequently I took a very different route.
It took two decades before it was possible to sit confidently on a crowded train with the trousers and pants down around the ankles, feet sitting as they were in Converse trainers. Hence, personally I have no time for these people who are now determined to diminish masculinity on the rail network, whether it is underground or overground. It isn't as if anyone's opportunities for promotion and financial piggery are at stake there. Plus in summer it is still uber-power cleavage central.
Footnote: one of the hilarious things about the news coverage is all of the photos of examples appear to hint of the men having erections. Those who are grossly offended or threatened just by a sitting position flatter themselves that it is all about them and ironically are clearly over-sexualised. If TfL had the decency to provide smoother trains and buses, much of the so-called issue would be resolved as the last thing on earth most people are is so sexually attractive as to arouse.