If they had their way they'd probably throw the working classes back into workhouses
They've always shown nothing but contempt for us - and now they have the excuse of the 'recession' to finally do all the nasty shit they've always wanted to but couldn't before
Still
If people vote for them come May it'll be on their own heads
If they think its bad now - wait until the bastards have been given another five years
They've just begun
Here's the thing Rolfe and Saville et al had no real power
But government ministers? Controlling billion pound budgets they could be blackmailed
Were we almost nuked because the KGB had photos of a senior minister bumming a boy scout?
Quote: Stylee TingTing @ 13th July 2014, 2:48 PM BSTThe Havers triumvirate is getting absolutely slaughtered on the popular press hustings:
F**k me
You couldn't make this stuff up
The former judge appointed to investigate allegations of an establishment cover-up of child sex abuse kept allegations about a bishop out of the public domain because the 'press would love a bishop'
The retired judge appointed to lead the Government's major review of child sex abuse allegations kept allegations about a bishop out of a report on a paedophile scandal because she "cared about the Church", it has emerged.
Baroness Butler-Sloss told a victim of alleged abuse that she did not want to include the claims because "the press would love a bishop".
It comes days after Lady Butler-Sloss was forced to apologise for "inaccuracies" in a previous inquiry into two paedophile priests.
Bishop Ball, 82, the former Bishop of Lewes and Bishop of Gloucester, was charged this year with indecent assault offences and misconduct in a public office.
During a meeting at the House of Lords in 2011, Lady Butler-Sloss told Phil Johnson that she would "prefer not to refer to him" because he was "very old now" and she wanted the focus of any press coverage to be two priests who were prolific abusers - one of whom was dead and the other in prison.
She said she would mention the allegations in a private report to the Archbishop of Cantebury instead, according to The Times.
Mr Johnson, who was abused by a number of clergymen when he was a choirboy in the Church of England Diocese of Chichester and now sits on a National Safeguarding Panel for the Church, kept a detailed record of the meeting. He said he "felt pressured to agree to exclude information about the bishop from the report".
Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP who exposed the extent of Cyril Smith's child sex offences, said "there is information coming out by the day which suggests she [Lady Butler-Sloss] is unsuitable for the role".
The peer previously made crucial errors during an investigation into how the Church of England handled the cases of two ministers in Sussex who had sexually abused boys.
Eight months after her report was published Lady Butler-Sloss had to issue a six-page addendum in which she apologised for "inaccuracies" which, she admitted, arose from her failure to corroborate information which was given to her by senior Anglican figures as part of the inquiry.
Lady Butler-Sloss said she had always tried to be "fair and compassionate" and had "never put the reputation of any institution, including the Church of England, above the pursuit of justice for vicitms".
Seems like we're watching the wrong match tonight.
Apparently North Korea are playing Portugal in the World Cup final tonight.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/football-fans-north-korea-told-3849292
Sorry Sooty. Didn't see your link but I guess it was about this.
And chappers we've both been fooled or was a fake
And chappers we've both been fooled or was a fake
Quote: sootyj @ 13th July 2014, 5:17 PM BSTAnd chappers we've both been fooled or was a fake
And chappers we've both been fooled or was a fake
Oh really. Thanks to Jo Caulfield.
They lost to them 5-3 in 1966 quarter final though.
Re Lady Butler-Sloss ... I'm not being ageist but isn't she a bit old (80) to be given responsibility for such a huge, and possible long-term investigation?
Quote: sootyj @ 13th July 2014, 6:12 PM BSThttp://blogs.miaminewtimes.com/riptide/2013/04/wtf_pad_dude.php
He should be locked up in a sanitryarium.
I think he's taking the piss.
Bloody idiot.
Quote: sootyj @ 13th July 2014, 3:05 PM BSTHere's the thing Rolfe and Saville et al had no real power
But government ministers? Controlling billion pound budgets they could be blackmailed
Rolf was/is a multi-millionaire so it's possible he was blackmailed.
Quote: Oldrocker @ 13th July 2014, 6:26 PM BSTI think he's taking the piss.
I thought that story had a lot of padding
And so she quits . . stunning piece of judgement there Davey Boy.