British Comedy Guide

I read the news today oh boy! Page 1,078

The Leverson Report has just come out and there is hoo-ha on both sides with regards to the regulation of the British press. The Government wants to bring in tougher regulations and governing bodies, the press say that this will limit freedom of speech and prevent them from investigating people such as the Government.

As always, R.C. has the perfect, sensible solution for everything -

The Press must pay a yearly stipend into a 'Libel Fund', this fund will cover the legal and court costs of the individuals they have wronged. Free legal services will be given to those wronged in the Press and judges will be under orders to hand out new maximum fines (£1 Million+) if the Press have proven to be libellous.

So if you appear on the front page of a newspaper with the banner headline 'Mr. Wotsit is a Paedo', you'll get free legal counsel and costs to take the newspaper to court. The total cost of the trial - judges, lawyers, etc. will be covered by the 'Libel Fund' and if the newspaper is proven to have wrongly labelled Mr. Wotsit as a Paedo, they'll have to pay him over a million squids.

Five or six court cases like that in the space of few months and the shareholders will demand higher journalistic standards or threaten to pull investment.

Thats quite a smart idea. Certainly the libel laws have been for years a richman's law.

Albeit having the power to pay enormous fines has been one way for big papers to out spend their rivals.

So I'd add some additional vile punishment to editors and propietors fines.

Quote: sootyj @ November 28 2012, 2:41 PM GMT

So I'd add some additional vile punishment to editors and propietors fines.

I agree, perhaps bring in a list of previous convictions for a particular press organisation, editor or even journalist and start to threaten jail time if they don't change their ways.

I was thinking of making them act the most lurid and hideous stories they've accused people of.

So basically lie about a story. And get forced to drive into snappy snaps whilst having a wank.

That'll sort the bastards out.

Quote: sootyj @ November 28 2012, 2:49 PM GMT

I was thinking of making them act the most lurid and hideous stories they've accused people of.

If these people had a sense of shame in the first place, then we wouldn't need a Leverson Report.

Though it would make me smile if a journalist was forced to have a wank in Snappy Snaps and got run over by George Michael's Range Rover.

Is it inconsistent that we condemn the "rape" of animals, but permit their "murder"? Or does it in some ways reflect the way society views those who commit such crimes against humans?

Cows are asking for it, having such short skirts of beef.

Oh my God what are you all on about now!

Quote: Nogget @ November 28 2012, 5:13 PM GMT

Is it inconsistent that we condemn the "rape" of animals, but permit their "murder"?

I think it all ties in with unnecessary cruelty, so I can't see a conflict. Besides, I don't want to eat my KFC in the knowledge that some Kraut has been up it's combined Arse-pussy.

'This better be special sauce mutha fukker.'

Quote: Renegade Carpark @ November 28 2012, 5:40 PM GMT

I think it all ties in with unnecessary cruelty, so I can't see a conflict. Besides, I don't want to eat my KFC in the knowledge that some Kraut has been up it's combined Arse-pussy.

'This better be special sauce mutha fukker.'

Chickens are a special case though, because they do like a cock.

Other birds like a cockatoo.
And donkeys like it up the ass.
etc

Quote: Nogget @ November 28 2012, 6:09 PM GMT

Chickens are a special case though, because they do like a cock.

Other birds like a cockatoo.
And donkeys like it up the ass.
etc

Let's hope this serious subject doesn't descend into a series of bad puns, because as we all know...I saw a camel hump once!

How is it ethically if you don't have sex with animals, but make animals from different species get it on - like making a dog shag a goat?

Quote: Renegade Carpark @ November 28 2012, 5:40 PM GMT

I think it all ties in with unnecessary cruelty, so I can't see a conflict. Besides, I don't want to eat my KFC in the knowledge that some Kraut has been up it's combined Arse-pussy.

'This better be special sauce mutha fukker.'

There's nothing slacker than a poultry cloaca

Quote: Renegade Carpark @ November 28 2012, 5:40 PM GMT

I think it all ties in with unnecessary cruelty, so I can't see a conflict. Besides, I don't want to eat my KFC in the knowledge that some Kraut has been up it's combined Arse-pussy.

'This better be special sauce mutha fukker.'

There's nothing slacker than a poultry cloaca

Quote: Renegade Carpark @ November 28 2012, 5:40 PM GMT

I think it all ties in with unnecessary cruelty, so I can't see a conflict. Besides, I don't want to eat my KFC in the knowledge that some Kraut has been up it's combined Arse-pussy.

'This better be special sauce mutha fukker.'

There's nothing slacker than a poultry cloaca

Quote: Renegade Carpark @ November 28 2012, 6:50 PM GMT

Let's hope this serious subject doesn't descend into a series of bad puns, because as we all know...I saw a camel hump once!

How is it ethically if you don't have sex with animals, but make animals from different species get it on - like making a dog shag a goat?

I bet he would Ram it in, doggy-style.

I got arrested for having a cold on a pony farm

All I said was I felt as little horse

Quote: Stylee TingTing @ November 28 2012, 7:05 PM GMT

I thought Zoophilia was fantasising about website moderators,

Ooh! Do you do that too ?

Share this page