Quote: DaButt @ November 5 2008, 12:30 PM GMT
There will be at least 2 years for him to claim that his lack of progress is due to the enormous burden dumped on him by the Bush administration. The current congress is still saying the same thing years after promising to be the hardest-working, change-enabling group of representatives in history. You think Bush's approval ratings are low, the numbers for the current congress are much worse.
The pay is only $400,000 per year; peanuts compared to what he could make on the outside. Bill Clinton has made $52 million in speaking fees since he left office.
I don't think anyone but the most gullible (surely not you, DaButt?) thinks Obama's earnings will be linked only to his official salary as President. If he only remains in office one week, he is effectively 'made for life'. You know that.
As for him having two years to blame Bush. If that is so, it is a sad idictment of the gullibility of your fellow countrymen. Wise up, y'all!!!
To be fair though, our lot are just as dim. If they vote the Tories in next, the Tories will blame Labour for the entire duration of their term!