Bangs on men or women to me look stupid but really since the 80's they have not been seen until Recently.
Lately it seems every women has been flocking to this hairstyle. As indicated in the title of this post to me bangs are not much better then mullets in my opinion. Short in the front and long in the back = mullet and the shorter it gets in the front in relation to the back is just the worst.
That's just my opinion. Sorry had to vent..it seemed as if every women on the bus was sporting them.
Bangs = mullet
It's called a fringe.
And yes, it's f**king awful. Looks totally, utterly ridiculous. Hopefully someone will realise that soon.
Aw. I don't have a fringe/bangs. But some girls look ace with them!
I see what you mean though, a mullet with another name... it's true!
What the hell are bangs?
A fringe!!!
Quote: ajp29 @ February 9, 2008, 12:36 PMWhat the hell are bangs?
Socialists can't read either?
Quote: zooo @ February 9, 2008, 12:23 PMAw. I don't have a fringe/bangs. But some girls look ace with them!
Like who? I honestly can't think of a single positive example. :-/
He can't see the screen through his bangs.
Quote: zooo @ February 9, 2008, 12:38 PMHe can't see the screen through his bangs.
I'll never understand fashion *puts on bomber jacket and walks away*
Quote: Aaron @ February 9, 2008, 12:38 PMLike who? I honestly can't think of a single positive example. :-/
Whats her face off ER has a decent fringe/bangs
Socailists can learn
They look all right.
Fringe? Got it! *Curt adds Fringe to his other list of unacceptable North American terms*
As for socialists and fringes..I wonder if Che Guevara sported bangs under that cap of his?
As for those pictures...they would still look better if the front and back lengths matched.
Quote: zooo @ February 9, 2008, 12:50 PMThey look all right.
Hmm, ok. But what about this?
Awful on every level.
Definitely.
Thats a wax work right?
Quote: Gavin @ February 9, 2008, 12:55 PMThats a wax work right?
On every level.