Quote: Charlie Boy @ February 5 2013, 7:37 AM GMTDoctor Who didn't have a great budget, then. It has a huge budget, now!
I bet it's not that big.
Doctor Who... Page 928
Probably bigger than it looks from the outside.
Quote: evan rubivellian @ February 5 2013, 10:59 AM GMTProbably bigger than it looks from the outside.
>_<
For zooo
Ha!!
Bloody hell, I do want that now...
Some cool stuff there, pity it's a US site.
As part of the BBC's blockbuster celebrations to mark the Doctor turning 50, fans will be able to see the Time Lord and his adventures like never before - in 3D! To be broadcast using some of the BBC's HD capacity, Steven Moffat, lead writer and executive producer, said: "It's about time. Technology has finally caught up with Doctor Who and your television is now bigger on the inside. A whole new dimension of adventure for the Doctor to explore."
Meh. Maybe that's very exciting if you're nine. Rather they put whatever money and effort used on that into the episode itself.
More exciting is the just announced return of a classic series baddie.
Tell us in tiny writing!
Quote: zooo @ February 11 2013, 9:16 PM GMTTell us in tiny writing!
I don't have 3D anyway, not sure many people do.
Quote: zooo @ February 11 2013, 9:16 PM GMTTell us in tiny writing!
It's not a secret, they've announced it already, but - Ice Warriors
*Googles*
I hope the 3D in Doctor Who is like the 3D in Arrested Development.
Quote: chipolata @ February 5 2013, 10:58 AM GMTI bet it's not that big.
£800,000 an episode.
Watching The Robots of Death.
And why not.
I'm sure one of the women was in EastEnders later on.
I can see her chatting to Dirty Den.