Quote: Renegade Carpark @ July 25 2012, 4:00 PM BST
Too late! You have garnered my ire for all time!
If I want to make fun of Tom Daley and the endless programmes about him where he's only dressed in a pair of Speedos the entire time, then I am well within my rights as an angry bloke.
However, my assertion that we are bombarded by images and shows about him almost constantly because of a BBC gay mafia could be criticised as just a baseless accusation.
It's not though, but it could be criticised.
Why does it make you "an angry bloke" to see other men in Speedos? He dives - so it surely makes sense that he appears in what is essentially uniform. If he didn't, I bet his hair, his build or his voice among other things would still make you angry. Just like the female contestants being called lesbians on Twitter because they have muscular builds. It's completely ridiculous. Acting a certain way does not make you gay, and being gay does not make you any less of a person. Nor does it make it any more acceptable for people to ridicule you and you choices.
Quote: Renegade Carpark @ July 25 2012, 4:12 PM BST
I'm not going on about 'yucky gay people', I'm going on about having to see close ups of a penis and balls when I'm trying to watch the telly.
By concentrating soley on Tom Daley's male genitalia, the television makers are being entirely sexist.
I demand early evening flange and lots of it to counteract this overtly sexist behaviour by programme makers.
So you wouldn't be complaining then, if it was women being objectified in what you call a sexist manner? Cos I can show you a few examples of that...although if I posted them here I'm really not sure how they'd be used.
I am going to ignore this thread for a bit.