SketchJam
Tuesday 17th January 2012 9:32pm [Edited]
Watford
6 posts
Quote: smc4761 @ January 8 2012, 6:43 PM GMT
I am a big fan of early 20th century comedy, the old silent movies in particular. I think that many of today's acts owe a great deal to these early pioneers. In particular Harold Lloyd, Buster Keaton, Laurel and Hardy, and most things from the Mack Sennett Studios, although for some reason I am not a great fan of Charlie Chaplin.
There we literally hundreds of these made each year. Now I appreciate that some of the material will have been lost/destroyed but surely there must be shedloads to show and yet it rarely is shown.
Are today's audiences too sophisticated to appreciate this type of comedy, or is it just not good enough?
As the old saying goes "Actions speak louder than words" and I think all comedy has to pay its respect to this era of film for what it did in comedy. Stand-up comedy and the telling of jokes have been around since the dawn. When the silent movie came out, it must have been really hard to think up original gags every time other than someone taking un unfortunate tumble to create some laughs. How many times have we seen the gag where the guy is moving around in front of a mirror.... only it's not a mirror and his reflection is the very person he's trying to catch (one of my favourite gags even 100 years on)? This comedy was very clever for its day, but as soon as film evolved into sound the age old telling of jokes was always going to take over.
Like Charlie Chaplin or not, he always said that his character should never speak and he stood by the silent movie till the end.