http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breast
I must applaud Wikipedia for this, not just because I'd like to sup at those teats till the moon turned turquoise, but for having the balls to show boobs, which is a damn sight more than I can say for YouTube.
M, what harumphs
I believe most broadcasters are allowed to show boobs and whatnot for education purposes.
How odd. That particular page is blocked by the company webfilters for 'nudity'.
It's not like none of us have seen a breast before - our main products are for breast cancer.
Even stranger - 'breast reduction' isn't blocked but it has far more pictures of much bigger breasts.
If you go to 'ejaculation' you even get a video.
Quote: Leevil @ November 24 2011, 1:21 PM GMTI believe most broadcasters are allowed to show boobs and whatnot for education purposes.
I am a big fan of the screening of whatnots.
Quote: Leevil @ November 24 2011, 1:21 PM GMTI believe most broadcasters are allowed to show boobs and whatnot for education purposes.
Are whatnots those jangly bits that dangle below my...um...<cough>
Quote: Leevil @ November 24 2011, 1:21 PM GMTI believe most broadcasters are allowed to show boobs and whatnot for education purposes.
At this stage, I must have the equivalent of a PHD.
Quote: Leevil @ November 24 2011, 1:21 PM GMTI believe most broadcasters are allowed to show boobs and whatnot for education purposes.
Why wouldn't you be able to show whatnots? Fine pieces of Victorian furniture.
Bewbs.
That's the sort of thing that can turn a man gay.
Get your lobules out for the lads
Quote: Jamey @ November 24 2011, 3:57 PM GMTBewbs.
I thought that said we had duck fat in there then... would explain a lot.
Quote: David Bussell @ November 24 2011, 1:51 PM GMTIf you go to 'ejaculation' you even get a video.
It's a bit of a weird video - how does he manage to ejaculate without receiving any penile stimulation?
I thought this thread was going to be about amusing Wikipedia errors.