He's not a troll Sooty, he just cares a lot about trying to wake people up to what he truly believes is true. Wearing his heart on his sleeve, because these things have turned his head.
Not once has he resorted to insulting anyone (directly, not abstractly) which is to be applauded in a way, because these 'truthers' usually climb on a pedestal and claim we're all part of a neo-nwo.
Anyway, as someone who used to have an intrest in this stuff.
If I may join the Link party?
CATSKILLS...
It seems Big Fella is the only one here actually qualified to pass on informed information. Me, I can only give my personal opinion based on the knowledge of others, as can you.
And, so, in leaving it to people who know more than you or I, I pass on the following links. They are precise, informed and researched. Thy don't have the air of hysterical nutjobs screeching 'the world's against us'.
It's good to have an opinion, but it's even better to hear both the sides before forming one.
Like you, when I was young, I saw a few blurred DVD clips, took them out of context, took the 'facts' stated as gospel and got carried away in my 'angry young persecuted man' way. Then, I grew up, learned how politics and 'Flags' actually work, have worked in the past, I decided there was no feasible way or orchestrating an inside job, simply to incite a war for oil - The war was carried out on false pretense - but that's a different topic.
(When I was 11 or 12 I used to believe in ghosts, aliens, God. When I was 4 or 5 I believed in Tooth Fairies, Father Christmas and so on.)
This is a word document that goes through every clip/footage on the conspiracy and explains the reality. Painstakingly Point by point.
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/911_loose_change_2_guide_1.doc
http://www.debunking911.com/quick.htm
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
http://www.structuremag.org/archives/2007/March%202007/D-Spotlight-
ComputerModeling-Mar07.pdf
http://www.debunk911myths.org/
http://www.911myths.com
"Screw the maniacs who troll the net looking to pass off other people's ideas as their own."
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-6596630292015140276&hl=en-CA
http://ldspatriot.wordpress.com/tag/conspiracy-theories/
http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk
http://www.sawyerhome.net/whatilearned.html
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.counterpunch.org/physic11282006.html
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2702/
http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/story.html?id=903b3f4a-2e6c-47b4-b710-632c1439aacc&p=1
Did the U.S. government plan and execute the 9/11 attacks?
http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/911truth.html
http://www.alternet.org/story/41601/
9/11 Conspiracy Fantasies
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/41423/
http://insidehighered.com/views/2006/09/06/mclemee
9/11 Conspiracy Theories Persist, Thrive
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=2281052
Why The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1531304,00.html
9/11: Debunking The Myths
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defence/1227842.html
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000DA0E2-1E15-128A-9E1583414B7F0000
http://www.nymetro.com/news/features/16464/
Facts about 9/11. Not Fantasy
http://www.geocities.com/factsnotfantasy/
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=66
The 9/11 Conspiracy: A Skeptic's View
http://www.crisispapers.org/essays6p/skeptic.htm
Debunking the 9/11 Movement
http://www.infoshop.org/texts/debunking911.html
Interview with Prof. Jonathan Barnett, an expert in structural and fire protection engineering who was one of the WTC investigators
http://www.wpi.edu/News/Transformations/2002Spring/fall.html
http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/Post911/demnowfaq.html
http://www.publiceye.org/frontpage/911/conspiracist.html
http://perrylogan.org/
http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
http://loosetrains911.blogspot.com/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7501020220921158523&q=penn+teller+911
http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2006/06/27/911_conspiracies/index.html
http://sciam-editor.typepad.com/weblog1/2005/05/a_conspiracy_of.html
http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/26/15/feature1.shtml
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=66
http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
http://www.geocities.com/someguyyoudontknow33/
At least when you look at something from all angles it's easier to form a coherrent argument rather than throwing about half-digested chunks of edited info.