British Comedy Guide

Latest Monopoly, Includes Bailouts, Cocaine Page 2

Quote: Vader @ April 29 2011, 6:28 PM BST

Yeah, but my point was that banks would care about how much money and assets you have, not how good you are at hiding them, likewise in the game, if you hide your wealth too well, you'll be perceived as weak and get worse deals.

I understood your point Vader. You didn't understand the point about toxic debt. It's not supposed to be a real game it is a funny take on the world wide recession we are all in and have been in due to the very fact that what you say is ridiculous actually happened .

When the real world is funnier than the satire then the satire had better be bloody good.

Quote: Badge @ April 29 2011, 10:56 PM BST

When the real world is funnier than the satire then the satire had better be bloody good.

It was good though, in this case don't you think?

Quote: Marc P @ April 29 2011, 11:05 PM BST

It was good though, in this case don't you think?

I don't know. It's all written in such an American newspaper way it's difficult to tell from here. In general it doesn't seem funny enough to me, but I have probably missed quite a bit of nuance in the US style.

Quote: Marc P @ April 29 2011, 10:54 PM BST

I understood your point Vader. You didn't understand the point about toxic debt. It's not supposed to be a real game it is a funny take on the world wide recession we are all in and have been in due to the very fact that what you say is ridiculous actually happened .

A good analogy should make sense in both contexts, that was my point.

Quote: Vader @ April 29 2011, 6:28 PM BST

Yeah, but my point was that banks would care about how much money and assets you have, not how good you are at hiding them, likewise in the game, if you hide your wealth too well, you'll be perceived as weak and get worse deals.

There are definitely some subtle jabs at American banking, greed, and moral hazard in there.
Marc P got it right when he mentioned the toxic assets. The banks here had to puff up their chests and look like their balance statements were clean so that the market wouldn't short them out of existence. It happened to some of the biggest banks in the US. Once other banks saw how much toxic assets they were holding, they wouldn't lend overnight paper to them, and they would go bankrupt overnight.
The part about the bailout option, that's been much more prevalent in the US than than in Britain and continental Europe. Perhaps you got that one. But there's a theme over here now that if you are a super big company, you are deemed "too big to fail" and the government bails you out of trouble if you get into trouble.

Is it more like 'conspiriousy theory' we hear them all the time, even the dollar bill with its 'proctor and Gamble' 'Eye in pyramid' senario?

Share this page