British Comedy Guide

Lunch Monkeys - Series 2

https://www.comedy.co.uk/tv/lunch_monkeys/

From the channel which cancelled Pulling and hot on the heels of Coming Of Age, it's the second series of Lunch Monkeys, being strained out and smeared all over your TV screens on the 3rd February! In Episode 1, Nigel Havers returns to earn some guilty, filthy, easy money - whilst Asif is caught grooming vulnerable young working class girls into lives of drugs, prostitution and knob gags! Look out for a special cameo by Steve Edge as a man who appears in every bad sitcom ever made.

Since the first series was broadcast, the slang term "lunch monkey" has (as Danny Cohen once predicted) caught the ear of the youth of the nation, so much so that when someone at work says "Where's that lunch monkey?", everyone knows they mean "Where's that appalling mess of a BBC Three sitcom?" or "Where's that unfunny c**t?". (Recommissioning this and Coming Of Age is rumoured to be part of Cohen's "scorched Earth" initiative for BBC Three, upon hearing of his move to BBC One.)

*weeps inconsolably whilst dousing self in petrol* Teary

I'd be lying if I implied I had anything like "high hopes" for this, but the first series did grow on me somewhat by the end. It was by no means anything special, nor in many places even very funny, but by the final episode or two I wasn't dreading watching it as I had been.

Quote: Tim Walker @ January 26 2011, 12:32 AM GMT

https://www.comedy.co.uk/tv/lunch_monkeys/

From the channel which cancelled Pulling and hot on the heels of Coming Of Age, it's the second series of Lunch Monkeys, being strained out and smeared all over your TV screens on the 3rd February! In Episode 1, Nigel Havers returns to earn some guilty, filthy, easy money - whilst Asif is caught grooming vulnerable young working class girls into lives of drugs, prostitution and knob gags! Look out for a special cameo by Steve Edge as a man who appears in every bad sitcom ever made.

Since the first series was broadcast, the slang term "lunch monkey" has (as Danny Cohen once predicted) caught the ear of the youth of the nation, so much so that when someone at work says "Where's that lunch monkey?", everyone knows they mean "Where's that appalling mess of a BBC Three sitcom?" or "Where's that unfunny c**t?". (Recommissioning this and Coming Of Age is rumoured to be part of Cohen's "scorched Earth" initiative for BBC Three, upon hearing of his move to BBC One.)

*weeps inconsolably whilst dousing self in petrol* Teary

*hands walker empty fire extinguisher*

Ah, those halcyon days where we mused about the dreadful coinage of 'Lunch Monkeys' and offered our own slick and witty alternatives... Until Aaron blanked out our posts for being off topic.

In truth Pulling wasn't all that funny and was insufferably smug to boot, but at least it had a decent title.

Lunch Monkeys isn't a bad show if you can get beyond the title, but it's nothing to write home about either. There are far too many characters, too much running around and some seriously weak gags. Clearly it could be improved by being put in a blender with Coming of Age to produce 'Spunk Monkeys', a naughty sexcom featuring Nigel Havers getting a titwank from the underused actress from Northern Lights and the Sublime Kulvinder Ghir selling ketamine and 99s from his ice cream van.

Qualiteee.

Quote: Godot Taxis @ January 26 2011, 11:15 AM GMT

Lunch Monkeys isn't a bad show if you can get beyond the title

Laughing out loud

It was f**king atrocious you daft c**t!

You miserable prick, it was only poor - not atrocious. Mind you, I only saw a couple of them.

Why?! Just why?!

Ah, come on, don't write this off until you've at least seen a few minutes of the first episode.

It's a young team making this so I'm guessing they learnt a few things whilst making the first series and will be trying hard to make sure Series 2 is great.

Not saying it will be, but let's give it a chance. If it isn't, it'll still be fun to try and contemplate why a smallish law firm that no doubt uses lots of email still needs such a big team for its post room, and trying to spot the cord Nigel Havers is attached to as he phones in his performance in return for another fat cheque.

(* I wish these forums existed in the 80s so I could link back to the inevitable 'Oh no, Blackadder is coming back' thread that would have no doubt been created back then... it'd have been useful to highlight how it's unfair to write-off a show until it's had a second chance.)

If the BBC want to save money by cancelling comedy shows, they could start with this one. It's not funny!

Quote: Mark @ January 29 2011, 7:38 PM GMT

Ah, come on, don't write this off until you've at least seen a few minutes of the first episode.

Will 2 minutes and 4 seconds do, Mr B? :)

https://www.comedy.co.uk/tv/lunch_monkeys/videos/

Errr

Quote: Mark @ January 29 2011, 7:38 PM GMT

(* I wish these forums existed in the 80s so I could link back to the inevitable 'Oh no, Blackadder is coming back' thread that would have no doubt been created back then... it'd have been useful to highlight how it's unfair to write-off a show until it's had a second chance.)

To compare series 1 of Lunch Monkeys to the first series of Blackadder (albeit in a tongue-in-cheek way) is kind to the former and cruel to the latter. The first series of Blackadder still has moments of greatness (Jim Broadbent's Spanish translator, the Witchsmell Pursuivant trial, Rik Mayall as Mad Gerald etc...) and I recall being more than happy with it when it was first transmitted. It suffers in comparison with series 2-4, but then so does the vast majority of sitcom.

(OK, I was only 10 years old and so may not have had the exceptional comedy palate I possess today, but I was able to compare & contrast with Terry and June at the time, which even at that tender age I knew in my bones was a bit creaky).

If I'm honest, it really feels like an effort to try and watch this new series.

The first was watchable, and entertaining enough, but it never made me *want* to watch it.

Dan

Having started this thread, I felt that the decent* thing to do was to actually watch and report on the first episode...

Apart from a few touches to make the overall production look a little bit more polished, nothing has really changed. The characters are still very two-dimensional and inconsistent, with nothing about them which makes them either sympathetic or interesting to watch. And my God this episode crawled along at a snail's pace! I never realised just how long 28 minutes can actually feel. Although, paradoxically, plot-wise there was meant to be a lot going on, with 3 or 4 "storylines" competing for my lack of attention.

At one point I could actually hear the script screaming, as if in the throes of a psychotic breakdown. Desperately trying to pull itself together, it randomly threw in every stock device in the sitcom textbook, but none of them worked successfully and it was left weeping on the floor as the end-credits rolled. By this I don't mean that the script wasn't technically competent, just that it could never really get going, because the concept of the show fundamentally doesn't work. In fact, this show doesn't really have a cogent premise whatsoever. It's never really known exactly what it is, so it tries to be everything, and ends up being nothing.

As with every episode of series 1 (and the pilot, Admin) this one just didn't gel. I can applaud the makers for trying to steer clear of being just another knob gag-obsessed youth sitcom, but it falls woefully short of creating a credible and interesting world of its own. I'm scratching my head as to who this show is actually meant to appeal to. I'm further scratching my head as to why it's been taken to a second series when it's so fatally flawed. Maybe it's sheer bloody-mindedness on the part of the BBC? In some ways I'd quite admire that, if it wasn't for the fact that a second series of this means that some other show didn't get a go.

The gags were generally woeful and nothing you haven't heard a thousand times before. Compared with the first series, it appears that the cast have been told to try and tone down their performances (though this memo didn't appear to have quite reached the actors playing Asif and Gloria). However, the more naturalistic performances are wasted without any witty or original dialogue to serve them. There's not simply laboured banter and stilted gags going on here, but whole sections of dialogue/plot which simply pass in one ear and out the other without registering. I really tried to concentrate but my mind kept wandering, as there really was nothing of interest to hold my attention.

The one positive thing I can say about this show is to praise the actor (Steve John Shepherd) playing solicitor Charlie. He's not got anything much of merit to work with, but his performance suggests an actor with genuine comic potential. It would be nice to see him in something other than this, as he's easily the best thing in this otherwise terribly weak show.

(*or vindictive, depending on your point of view)

I'm watching this now. It's almost offensively bland.

I thought it was ... well, I'm not going to say "good", but passable. Some bits continue to not gel and not work, just in the same way that they didn't work or gel in Series 1, so I'm not sure that the production team took the chances they should have done to reflect on the finished article.

But it just about managed to keep my attention. A couple of the plot strands were, uh, well "interesting" would probably be overstating it, but they weren't disengaging. And the odd line and snip of performance is sort of amusing - although I'm fairly sure I didn't laugh during the ep.

Ultimately, it's mildly entertaining but nothing special. I think that there are bits that show promise - but then they showed the same little gleams in Series 1, and just haven't been followed up. I think Tim said that the show doesn't seem like it knows what wants to be, and I have to agree. This time last series I was hostile to the show - now I'm just indifferent.

Tania and Havers' daughter are incredibly good looking. That Daryl's nose is so big it's offputting.

Right, there's my views on the characters. The show is painfully unfunny, to the point it's annoying it was even commissioned.

Managed to sit through all of the first two episodes but that's it for me - terrible stuff.

I presume Havers is doing this because he's getting an extension built and needs to pay for it.

Share this page