Quote: Nat Wicks @ January 15 2011, 4:36 PM GMTI think that's really telling and rather sad that you say you would RATHER cause a fatality through shooting. Until this point you've maintained that the guns were for protection, but never said that you would shoot with the intention of killing.
What I'd RATHER happen would be for nobody to break into my house, but if they do I'm not going to bet my life on them being beer buddies like Kenneth's intruders instead of budding Charles Mansons. If they run away at the sound of the slide on my pistol being racked then good for them, but if they confront me I'm going to shoot to kill.
I'm trained in the use of firearms and there is not an instructor on the planet who would train someone to shoot to wound. You always shoot to kill. There are 3 simple rules:
Don't carry a firearm unless you intend to use it.
Don't point a firearm at something unless you intend to kill it.
Don't stop shooting until the threat is neutralized.
Quote: Matthew Stott @ January 15 2011, 4:37 PM GMTWhat if a rope net scoops them up, so they're not killed or injured, but are merely made secure whilst you call the police? Obviously, as they hung in the net, swinging from side to side, you could jab at them with a stick, hard enough to leave a bruise but not penetrate flesh.
Illegal, I'm afraid, but it sounds like a lot of fun.