British Comedy Guide

So, what do we think 36 years on?

The balance of our population, our human stock is threatened.

A recent article in Poverty, published by the Child Poverty Action Group, showed that a high and rising proportion of children are being born to mothers least fitted to bring children into the world and bring them up.

They are born to mothers who were first pregnant in adolescence in social classes 4 and 5.

Many of these girls are unmarried, many are deserted or divorced or soon will be.

Some are of low intelligence, most of low educational attainment. They are unlikely to be able to give children the stable emotional background, the consistent combination of love and firmness which are more important than riches.

They are producing problem children, the future unmarried mothers, delinquents, denizens of our borstals, sub-normal educational establishments, prisons, hostels for drifters.

Yet these mothers, the under 20s in many cases, single parents, from classes 4 and 5, are now producing a third of all births.

A high proportion of these births are a tragedy for the mother, the child and for us.

Sir Keith Joseph
1974.

That people can still be misogynistic, interfering busybodies?

;)

I think he was right

I wonder how many of these same children are also the creation of the 'feast fitted' fathers?

Idiot men.

We just supply the spunk rest is upto the ladies;

with sperm banks there's been no need for men now for decades

pull your fingers out and take over already

Quote: sootyj @ November 29 2010, 10:46 PM GMT

I think he was right

I do agree with what he's saying, that less people, and better suited people should have babies. There are a ton of women who shouldn't be having babies. There are also a ton of men who shouldn't be making them.

But that article has such an anti woman feel. It took a man and a woman to make every one of those babies.

Maybe he wrote something similar about the men involved, if so, do link us to it.

Quote: Nat Wicks @ November 29 2010, 10:50 PM GMT

Idiot men.

Racist.

I suppose it's one half of the argument. Feckless males need to be made responsible, they're not much use to the kids.

Make them clean canals or what ever to support their kids

Quote: sootyj @ November 29 2010, 10:55 PM GMT

I suppose it's one half of the argument. Feckless males need to be made responsible, they're not much use to the kids.

Make them clean canals or what ever to support their kids

Yep!

I'm bordering on thinking we should make pregnancy/impregnation a crime.
With charges waved for capable mothers and commited fathers.

Ha! Never heard that one before. It's quite interesting!

Quote: zooo @ November 29 2010, 10:56 PM GMT

Yep!

But you may well not want them around.

Quote: sootyj @ November 29 2010, 10:57 PM GMT

But you may well not want them around.

It's okay, I don't live near a canal.

What the author is complaining about is that when a baby is brought up by only one of its parents, it's almost always the mother rather than the father who does the rearing.

Accordingly, huge numbers of children are being reared by what he would describe as unfit mothers and only a tiny number by similarly unfit fathers.

Hence, society has no significant problem with unfit fathers but it does have a huge problem with unfit mothers.

Simples.

Maybe he should have said that then!

Share this page