T.W.
Saturday 2nd October 2010 8:36pm [Edited]
15,786 posts
One of the problems is that the quasi-surreal nature of Merton (at his best) works most effectively when there are guests of sufficient stature and seriousness to contrast it. Now that politicians, writers, journalists and celebrities are sufficiently wise as to the show's format, and the role they're expected to play in it, any genuine edge has been lost. Merton worked best (and hardest) when he could catch off-balance/confuse serious guests with his levity - whilst Hislop would provide the "nasty cop" element in the form of serious questions and hard-edged satire.
I'm afraid that the show is a mere pastiche of itself now - one of the major reasons it's not very funny. The other, of course, is having celebrity guest hosts. Whilst Angus probably had to go because he'd become the story, now the only story of interest is who's hosting - hence the show's become just another branch of celebrity-based entertainment - another light-hearted quiz show. They should have picked a relative unknown who could have made the host's chair his/her own, whilst having the balls to stand up to Merton and Hislop. The show's terminal decline was pretty much guaranteed once the two regulars decided (with the producers) not to bring in a permanent replacement.
(I know the 'Angus issue' has been discussed ad infinitum on this and other boards - but, as the above alludes to, the reason the role of host has continued to be a thorny issue is because it was/is so important. The way it was handled was a mistake, a fatal error of judgement.)