Flavian
Wednesday 29th September 2010 2:44pm
651 posts
Ok - a 16th - 17th century playwright who obtained a primary role in entertaining royalty, compared to a current children's fiction author. I'd certainly say Rowling has proved 'better' at entertaining millions of kids across the world. But, yes, an asses head has given the odd smile too.
On top of this, Shakespeare is someone whose works have proved to stand the test of time. I'm a massive Shakespeare fan, but, and perhaps a little far-fetched, who's to say that in another 500 years time, ol' JK won't be more revered.
As we've already said, better was the wrong word. I don't think it scans, as they are two different figures, from two different times, doing two different things, for two different purposes.
To push this back to topic, if people say Michael McIntyre is second rate, then I'd again point to the majority who differ.
Sorry - just saw your response Nogget.
I've no problem with people being left cold - I've said that at the start of my involvement. I'm just pointing out that someone with genuine mass appeal, probably isn't rubbish.