Quote: writer for hire @ September 20 2010, 11:31 PM BSTAny idiot can write a story. It takes a good writer to sell it.
I think you'll find it's the other way round.
Quote: writer for hire @ September 20 2010, 11:31 PM BSTAny idiot can write a story. It takes a good writer to sell it.
I think you'll find it's the other way round.
Quote: Lazzard @ September 21 2010, 5:48 PM BST
I think you'll find it's the other way round.
What any writer can write a story, it takes a good idiot to sell it?
Quote: Tim Azure @ September 21 2010, 6:00 PM BSTWhat any writer can write a story, it takes a good idiot to sell it?
No, he means turn on a TV nowadays and you will see what he means.
Maybe you won't.
That's a bit harsh I think modern TV writing is as good as it's always been.
And what I meant was that anyone can write a story but it takes a good writer to write a good story
If you take the story of Cinderella for instance, if anything that has been sold less, it used to be much more bloodthirsty.
Does that mean the bad writers have been at it?
Quote: writer for hire @ September 21 2010, 10:32 PM BSTThat's a bit harsh I think modern TV writing is as good as it's always been.
And what I meant was that anyone can write a story but it takes a good writer to write a good story
Well if that is what you meant maybe that is what you should have said. Good and selling aren't unfortunately mutually inclusive.
I actually meant, it takes a good writer to tell a story.
If it's good, any idiot should be able to sell it.
And what Marc said too.
A story written by an idiot would probabaly contain a similar and or simian gramatical error such as "to time consuming", as was penned by the creator of this thread.
There are a lot of self-proclaimed, head-up-own-ass Prima Donnas around who think they are good writers.
And of course, you are so lucky that there are none of those whatsoever on BCG... <ahem>
As for a writing partner, I'd say find it may be better to find one organically rather than go fishing around forums on the off chance, geezer! Also, post some of your work in Critique and tag onto the end of your piece that you'd like to write with others. Maybe you'll tickle someone's fancy?
But hey, I met my writing and filming pals via a website (not this one, mind..) but we met up in a pub to talk first before doing any comedy together and it has been a long old haul since then (about 4 years) and we are still honing what we do and trying to write something we think is good (as is the way..)
A lot of fun has been had, that has been the main thing.
Quote: writer for hire @ September 20 2010, 11:26 PM BST^^^^^^^^^^^
What does this mean, BTW?
WriterForHire seems to employ it fairly liberally.
And I consider myself fairly up on emoticon/text speak ( for and old f****r).
Do share.
Generally used to refer to something directly above. ie in this case, the above post.
"Well if that is what you meant maybe that is what you should have said. Good and selling aren't unfortunately mutually inclusive. "
I disagree with that. I think if you're good you won't necessarily sell your script but if you do get to sell your script then it must be good. Therefore, anyone who sells a script has written a good script.
And by good I don't oscar winning standard. I mean the script is good enough for whatever it's meant for e.g. dumbed down script for dumbed down show
Quote: writer for hire @ September 22 2010, 3:20 PM BSTI disagree with that. I think if you're good you won't necessarily sell your script but if you do get to sell your script then it must be good. Therefore, anyone who sells a script has written a good script.
Did you see Lab Rats?
"Did you see Lab Rats?"
No. I'm guessing it's rubbish tho
EDIT: I just looked on Wikipedia and lab rats only ran for a series so my arguement would be the producers tried it, thinking it was good but dropped it when it turned out rubbish. Professional mistake, and obviously the first scripts make a good impression
Quote: writer for hire @ September 22 2010, 3:20 PM BSTGood and selling aren't unfortunately mutually inclusive. "
I disagree with that.If you do get to sell your script then it must be good. Therefore, anyone who sells a script has written a good script.
I have checked this definition of good in the dictionary. It doesn't seem to hold up. It comes back to scale really and putting things in perspective by making comparisons. All scripts that are sold are not all good.