British Comedy Guide

Sherlock Page 22

Sherlock is treading a line between retaining the spirit of the source material and updating the setting; it is not a modern police show with modern sensibilities, it is a Victorian thriller set against the backdrop of modern London. Murderous Chinese acrobats are a plot device consistent with the Victorian milieu, and I would suggest that this period aspect was made explicit in as much as that the gangsters were identified as Tongs, as one might expect in a Victorian novel, rather than as Triads, a more current criminal threat.

For what it is worth I find this treatment of Holmes more engaging than yet another lazy period adaptation; to my mind the original works were interpreted with Jermey Brett.

I can only explain the feeble final sequence of the last episode as wish-fulfilment of the writer's long term desire to see Yoko Ono shot in the head. Otherwise it did not make any kind of sense.

Quote: youngian @ August 5 2010, 10:27 AM BST

Maybe it wasn't Moriarty and Christopher Lee has reprised is role as Fu Manchu.

You can get away with anything that is good. And Christopher isn't good he's sublime.

Comparing him to the BBC's latest piss the license fee up the wall effort.

Is like comparing David Bowie to David van Day.

In my opinion.

Quote: Cheesehoven @ August 5 2010, 11:31 AM BST

I can only explain the feeble final sequence of the last episode as wish-fulfilment of the writer's long term desire to see Yoko Ono shot in the head. Otherwise it did not make any kind of sense.

Yeah. Except it did make sense, so your argument falls down there, really.

Quote: Matthew Stott @ August 5 2010, 12:28 PM BST

Yeah. Except it did make sense, so your argument falls down there, really.

How so? A gang member paints a new symbol outside Holmes flat, watched by Watson who does not mention it, then Yoko is shot in an apparently windowless room after a brief and desperate attempt to bring "Moriarty" into the plot.

Stupid and gimmicky beyond belief.

Quote: Cheesehoven @ August 5 2010, 1:37 PM BST

How so? A gang member paints a new symbol outside Holmes flat, watched by Watson who does not mention it, then Yoko is shot in an apparently windowless room after a brief and desperate attempt to bring "Moriarty" into the plot.

Stupid and gimmicky beyond belief.

I'm not going to explain it to you, sorry. Console

Well here's the next episode's synopsis:

Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman embark on their final thrilling, scary, action-packed and hugely entertaining adventure as Sherlock Holmes and Dr John Watson.

Despairing of the ingenuity of London's criminals, Sherlock is invited to take on what looks to be a very ordinary case - a young civil servant found on a railway line with his head smashed in. It seems to be open and shut - or so he thinks.

The curtain is about to rise on a terrifying game of cat and mouse as a crazed bomber pits his wits against Sherlock. A 20-year-old murder, a blood-soaked car, a rediscovered Old Master worth millions - it's just the kind of adventure Sherlock and John relish, but who is behind these deadly puzzles? London is set to become a battle ground as Sherlock confronts the one person capable of beating him.

Let's see what it's like.

Quote: Ben @ August 5 2010, 2:15 PM BST

Let's see what it's like.

Yes, let's. *waits*

According to an interview with Gatiss, the series was supposed to originally be six half hour episodes.

Quote: Matthew Stott @ August 6 2010, 1:42 PM BST

According to an interview with Gatiss, the series was supposed to originally be six half hour episodes.

Not sure that would have worked, there's so much to pack in. Oooh. Unless there would be just one story for the whole series?

Quote: bamalamafizzvaj @ August 6 2010, 2:41 PM BST

Not sure that would have worked, there's so much to pack in. Oooh. Unless there would be just one story for the whole series?

Well, the stories would have been told differently; last week's could certainly have done with being shorter.

Yeah it did feel long, unlike the opener.

Holmes is on the same days as COLUMBO and MURDER SHE WROTE.

I admire, but pity the foolhardy courage of BBC programmers putting their lackluster show against 2 such superior beasts. I am already marvelling in the wonder that is Peter Falk and his dog.

You are clearly insane.

I just watched Columbo and if you think Sherlock has to date been a patch on it.

Then you sir are a philistine.

Share this page