Quote: chipolata @ August 1 2010, 10:46 PM BSTFrequently Asked Questions About Time Travel. Great title, but the film's not doing much for me. A bit limp.
I quite enjoyed it, it built momentum.
Quote: chipolata @ August 3 2010, 7:04 PM BSTEven though it's probably a load of old toot, I quite fancy watching The Deep tonight.
I just watched it; shaping up as the innerspace equivalent of Defying Gravity (which isn't a good thing, in case anyone was wondering.)
Quote: Nil Putters @ August 4 2010, 3:13 PM BSTHe wasn't circumcised, he's now thinking about it.
Hmmmm, that sounds a little ginger beer. I mean, surely a circumcised one would be more scary looking. What do you say, Nil? Would you rather be staring at a glans or a foreskin?
That kind of question deserves it's own thread.
Quote: Ben @ August 4 2010, 9:38 PM BSTHmmmm, that sounds a little ginger beer. I mean, surely a circumcised one would be more scary looking. What do you say, Nil? Would you rather be staring at a glans or a foreskin?
That's not a question I've been asked before.
Not being Jewish, but having seen a lot of porn I'd say a circumcised willy is 'neater'.
But I wouldn't let anyone near my excess knob skin.
I wouldn't like to lose mine either. I like to stretch it out and go exploring in in it. Sometimes I make silly noises whilst I'm in there. Then I get VERY, VERY hard.
Umm 
That's not gettin it's own thread.
I just watched the Normans. We still lost the battle of Hastings.
The problem with this sort of documentary is that they always assume a zero level of knowledge, whereas the only people to watch them are those who already have an interest in the subject.
Basically you should only watch TV documentaries on subjects you are not interested in.
Quote: Ben @ August 4 2010, 9:46 PM BSTI wouldn't like to lose mine either. I like to stretch it out and go exploring in in it. Sometimes I make silly noises whilst I'm in there. Then I get VERY, VERY hard.
Quote: Timbo @ August 4 2010, 11:13 PM BSTThe problem with this sort of documentary is that they always assume a zero level of knowledge, whereas the only people to watch them are those who already have an interest in the subject.
Basically you should only watch TV documentaries on subjects you are not interested in.
Quite true. And a good rule of thumb.
If, like me, you were a fan of Damages, you'll be pleased to learn it's been un-axed:
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/ustv/news/a256489/byrne-excited-by-damages-renewal.html
Quote: john lucas 101 @ August 5 2010, 3:09 PM BSTIf, like me, you were a fan of Damages, you'll be pleased to learn it's been un-axed:
Excellent news, I just wish I was online to share it when you broke it. And great to see it's got another two series.
The Undercover Boss, basically it is the same each week: the boss goes undercover and makes two shocking and wholly unexpected discoveries, 1) that their employees are human beings rather than figures on a balance sheet, and 2) that none of them give a flying f**k about the company brand, and are motivated rather by not wanting to let down colleagues and customers. Who would have known?
Miami and London Ink reruns, as I'm too lazy to find something better that I haven't seen before.
Come Dine with me Down Under.
Who'd have thought there was such a thing as a posh Australian?