He was a lovely fella and no mistake.
I read the news today oh boy! Page 173
Quote: Matthew Stott @ July 12 2010, 1:25 PM BSTHis brother was on the radio earlier, saying Moat didn't deserve what happened; didn't he try to kill three people, successfully in one case?
No, he didn't.
(He only wanted to permanently scar his ex-girlfriend.)
What a f**king gent.
Darling I'll never kill you only permanently scar you.
But if you point a gun and shoot at someone you are aware they might quite likely die. (And didn't he shoot at her twice?)
Quote: Aaron @ July 12 2010, 6:06 PM BSTNo, he didn't.
(He only wanted to permanently scar his ex-girlfriend.)
Well he obviously wasn't a very good shot. Still managed to shoot someone else though.
Quote: zooo @ July 12 2010, 6:11 PM BSTBut if you point a gun and shoot at someone you are aware they might quite likely die. (And didn't he shoot at her twice?)
He must have cared. Not like those cads who just stab their partners.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/stoke_and_staffordshire/10596808.stm
It's the BBC so I'm assuming this story is for real.
If it is it really is political correctness gone completely mad.
Well. That's not the craziest story of that type I've ever read.
You'd think they could just keep their mouths shut though. Are they allowed out in the rain? What if they look up? 
Quote: zooo @ July 12 2010, 6:39 PM BSTWell. That's not the craziest story of that type I've ever read.
You'd think they could just keep their mouths shut though. Are they allowed out in the rain? What if they look up?
Uh-oh, zooo's on an anti-religion rampage!
Quote: Aaron @ July 12 2010, 6:06 PM BSTNo, he didn't.
(He only wanted to permanently scar his ex-girlfriend.)
He shot three people, I think you may be splitting hairs there.
Quote: zooo @ July 12 2010, 6:11 PM BSTBut if you point a gun and shoot at someone you are aware they might quite likely die.
Quite.
Quote: Aaron @ July 12 2010, 6:06 PM BSTNo, he didn't.
(He only wanted to permanently scar his ex-girlfriend.)
Is he your new hero, Aaron?
Quote: Matthew Stott @ July 12 2010, 7:06 PM BSTHe shot three people, I think you may be splitting hairs there.
No, just dealing in (apparent) facts.
You should be a lawyer or summink.
Quote: Aaron @ July 12 2010, 7:54 PM BSTNo, just dealing in (apparent) facts.
Fine. His brother said he didn't deserve what happened to him; well, he shot three people, if you shoot at people (and this may come as something of a surprise) they might die. And guess what, one of them did die. Perhaps he didn't set out to kill anyone, but he did. There's another fact for you.
Quote: zooo @ July 12 2010, 7:58 PM BSTYou should be a lawyer or summink.
You got the summink part right. 
Quote: Matthew Stott @ July 12 2010, 8:01 PM BSTPerhaps he didn't set out to kill anyone, but he did. There's another fact for you.
An indisputed one.