But why does 'in a hundred years' measure relevance?
Now is more relevant isn't it?
Not that I'm necessarily saying any of this is important now, either. 
Status report Page 2,353
Quote: Aaron @ June 12 2010, 12:09 PM BSTBaumski.
Ah.
Quote: zooo @ June 12 2010, 12:19 PM BSTBut why does 'in a hundred years' measure relevance?
It was just an arbitrary figure I plucked out of the air!
I was merely responding to Aaron criticising someone for being irrelevant by suggesting that most people are. Who isn't? Guido Fawkes? Youngian? Toby Young? Robert Popper?
Konnie Huq!
Quote: zooo @ June 12 2010, 11:34 AM BSTSee, now I don't know if you're joking or not...
Quote: zooo @ June 12 2010, 11:29 AM BSTOr do you mean now we're achieving much bigger things?...
Yes that's what I meant!
Quote: chipolata @ June 12 2010, 12:16 PM BSTSeriously, in a hundred years we'll all be dead and forgotten about.
Maybe not; perhaps people will be studying the early years on the internet-era, and this very thread will be held up as an example of the first time anyone suggested that such a study might ever take place.
Quote: Nogget @ June 12 2010, 6:38 PM BSTMaybe not; perhaps people will be studying the early years on the internet-era, and this very thread will be held up as an example of the first time anyone suggested that such a study might ever take place.
No, I think somebody's already suggested a similar study on Chortle.
I am going out. Celebrating 8 wonderful years.
Quote: bigfella @ June 12 2010, 7:16 PM BSTI am going out. Celebrating 8 wonderful years.
8 years? You've only been a member of the BCG since December 2008.
Robyn is cold and oh so unfussed about football.
Just bought the Seinfeld series of Curb; looking forward to giving that a watch for the first time.
Quote: Scatterbrained Floozy @ June 12 2010, 7:48 PM BSTRobyn is so unfussed about football.
What does your football hooligan boyfriend say about that?
Chip's waiting for someone to arrive. He's just given the house a quick clean.
Is it your mum?