Those Apple Daily's are quite fun, but I think we should still bomb the cheaky foreigns.
Always amused to see Nick Griffin. Make the criminal scum dig ditches so that rural types can have broadband. Glad he still calls them scum and yes send the scummiest to Georgia.
But naughty naughty Paxo asking if he'd use gas chambers for executions.
Quote: Gavin @ April 23 2010, 6:34 PM BSTIs it because they dress slutty?
There's the irony, they criticise our white teenage sluts for dressing imorally when their own 'non sexual' wrapped up angels can't stop having kids.
Of course it's a fair point Griffin made, our NHS can't cope with it, our society can't cope with it, it's causing massive tension and resentment and mathematically it does mean they will one day out populate us in our own country.
I think there is a point for more direct engagament. As I said we need to put together special panels of judges for racially/religiously sensitive areas of law.
But with the absolute expectation of enforcement around areas of sensitivity.
We've done it very succesfully with forced marriage and with genital mutilation (still a problem outside the UK).
But cousin marriage, forced illiteracy, enforcement of Izit, restriction around dress, teaching of bigotry etc etc
Are huge problems.
Confident, literate women who feel protected by society don't have such massive families. Perversley Egypt and other Muslim countries have managed to lower their birth rates succesfully.
Quote: sootyj @ April 25 2010, 9:31 AM BSTAs I said we need to put together special panels of judges for racially/religiously sensitive areas of law.
Why?
Quote: Aaron @ April 25 2010, 3:21 PM BSTWhy?
To prevent areas of law being unenforced or unfairly enforced.
You have to do these things right.
What's wrong with a good old one-law-for-all, indiscriminatory judgement? The law is the law; to what extent should religion or culture come into it?
Because that usually leads to ghettoisation, unfair treatment etc.
Besides theres never been one law for all there's always been special interest groups.
Well there should be one for all. If people are supposedly equal. Rather than groups like gypsies being lesser beings, as we all know to really be the case.
We're not all equal but we have equal rights.
There is a diference.
Quote: Aaron @ April 25 2010, 3:32 PM BSTWhat's wrong with a good old one-law-for-all, indiscriminatory judgement? The law is the law; to what extent should religion or culture come into it?
Agree. The law should be a reflection of what society deems acceptable, You cannot have exceptions. I think it is outrageous that New Labour should have fudged the slaughterhouse regulations to put in a loophole for kosher and halal meat, Either as a society we think it is unacceptable to slit the throat of a conscious animal or we do not.
Well said. Brilliant example. If it's ok for them, why is it not ok for all? Really does not make any sense.
Those won't be the only loopholes. There'll be concession after concession until we are actually living under sharia law oursleves. We are so effing soft in this country! Or our poxy govts are! If foreigners come here to live then they must conform to our laws, our culture. And yes that includes religion.
But we are massively tied up by European law now. Even when our weak govt does try to make a stand it gets overuled by Europe! The EU is letting Islam walk all over the West! It is incredible what's happening. It's nuts.
The Single European Act was the worst thing Maggie ever did, by miles and miles and miles.
Quote: Alfred J Kipper @ April 25 2010, 7:54 PM BSTThe EU is letting Islam walk all over the West!
And so is Comedy Central. Apparently a certain prophet's name will be forever censored on South Park. That makes me so Muham-MAD.
We're in it up to our necks now. Why did Cameron say he won't give us a referendum now? He's crazy, most of Britain wants to be out of Europe and independent again. That is a massive vote winner and he bottled it !!?? Too much pressure from big businesses maybe? Something's stoppig him.