Another shitty podcast to listen to on the bus. Page 5

Quote: Paul W @ April 25 2010, 10:59 AM BST

What the hell are you on about? What do you consider from my post as being out of order? The only think I'm guilty of is being sarcastic (not in a spiteful way either might I add).

The way you 2 go on you act like you get it so tough on here, if you actually listened to what myself and Slagg have to say this wouldn't have gone on for 3 more pages (hence why I didn't want to reply after I said my first piece).

And if you still have a problem with my post why complain in several posts, Has this been PM'd to Aaron?

View original

"What the hell" am I on about? I think I made myself quite clear Paul.

No I haven't made an official complaint, because I'm not bothered, I was just pointing out that your post should be commented on, if David's are going to be. In the context of the thread, your post can only be read as antagonistic, even if that wasn't your intent.

And the way we go on? David defended himself because he was unfairly treated ON THIS THREAD. I joined in because I agreed. I don't get a hard time off people on here, why should I?

We listended to what you and Slag A said, as I think must be quite obvious by now, we didn't, and still don't, agree. It happens.

As David said, and as myself and Mr Slagg said, let's leave it there.

Quote: Matthew Stott @ April 25 2010, 11:12 AM BST

David defended himself because he was unfairly treated ON THIS THREAD.

View original

Matt, I can go and get your quotes for you if you want. The facts are: you agreed during this discussion that what was said boiled down to "This is shit". You also agreed that there was an initial response to OP.

This prompted my intervention. And as I've painfully and carefully explained, the intervention was reluctant and delayed but influenced by other recent posts.

And Paul's response wasn't ignored. It was raised.

Quote: Paul W @ April 25 2010, 10:59 AM BST

If you actually listened to what myself and Slagg have to say

View original

SlagA has entered into this discussion with an argument. What you've done is the equivalent of strolling in and making "Wa wa!" baby noises befor disappearing, only to come back later and complain that people are angry about something or other. I don't know what that is but I wouldn't call it modding.

It's a question of reputation. I operate here under my own name and behave in a way I like think reflects the kind of person I am. When someone calls me a liar or suggests I come here to deliberately upset people I feel I have the right to fight my corner. Please don't expect me to take shit and eat it.

And no, I haven't PM'd Aaron as he's already made his feelings on this matter quite clear.

Quote: SlagA @ April 25 2010, 11:31 AM BST

Matt, I can go and get your quotes for you if you want. The facts are: you agreed during this discussion that what was said boiled down to "This is shit". You also agreed that there was an initial response to OP.

This prompted my intervention. And as I've painfully and carefully explained, the intervention was reluctant and delayed but influenced by other recent posts.

View original

I have not agreed with you, I think it's quite obvious that I still don't agree with you. Agree that there was a response? Yes. Agree that it was a bad response? No. Agree that you were right in your response? No. So I still think it was unfair, which is what I said to Paul. As I said yesterday, we're obviously never going to agree on this, so this just becomes an exercise in saying the same things over and over again.

Quote: SlagA @ April 25 2010, 11:31 AM BST

And Paul's response wasn't ignored. It was raised.

View original

Well how was I supposed to know!

This is shit.

Bussell wonderful.

Why are you picking on him?

Is this site turning into the Whicker man?

What are these subcoms even laughing at?

Here we both agree on the content of what was said.

Quote: Matthew Stott @ April 24 2010, 3:04 PM BST

If the poster says 'this is shitty', then someone else says 'yes, this is shit', what's wrong with that?

View original

You repeatedly try to shift the idea of a 'response' on to me intervening, this is not the case. As anyone can see here:

Quote: Matthew Stott @ April 24 2010, 3:04 PM BST

I think both things leave the original poster open to the sort of response he got. And the response he got was hardly terrible.

View original

The response I and you are really referring to is the response that the OP received. This is the response that forced my intervention. The fact that you acknolwedged this cleared up in my mind that my initial instinct to intervene had been correct.

I really don't understand what you're going on about Slagg! I am saying I don't agree with the need for you to step in on this thread, I still don't agree. That's pretty clear is it not? I don't agree. You obviously think you did the right thing, I don't agree. There we are.

Yes we both agree on what David's response was, how could we not? But then we went down two different roads.

Quote: SlagA @ April 25 2010, 11:48 AM BST

The response I and you are really referring to is the response that the OP received. This is the response that forced my intervention.

View original

Yes, and the response the OP got did not require your intervention. That's my point. Well, my opinion, which you don't agree with. You think it required your intervention, I don't, that's all there is to it. Like I say, we're just saying the same things to each other over and over here, neither of us are going to agree with the other on this point so we might as well just get past it and let this thread die.

I think this really has to be my last comment on this now, as I'm getting dizzy from running round in circles! Let's just leave it be now, it can only lead to bad feeling the longer we go on restating our points.

Quote: Matthew Stott @ April 25 2010, 11:59 AM BST

Yes, and the response the OP got did not require your intervention.

View original

If I spot them, or if they are reported to me, any post in Crit that says "This is shit" draws my intervention.

You took David's side yet still had to agree (on both points) on the grounds of my initial concern, so it shouldn't be too much of a surprise, that I eventually came in.

I'm done!

What a shit podcast, what do you think guys?

Quote: Scottidog @ April 25 2010, 5:34 PM BST

What a shit podcast, what do you think guys?

View original

Careful now...

I hate you all.

And once more we see that all problems are caused by the Axis of Leevil.

We seem to be going around in circles now, so I'm going to close the thread for a while. It's clear that the same handful of replies have been read in very different ways by different people, so there's not going to be any agreement.