Quote: chipolata @ April 7 2010, 8:53 AM BSTYou've got an erection?
These little blue pills are fantastic. 
Status report Page 2,071
Quote: chipolata @ April 7 2010, 8:53 AM BSTIf you'd been ahead of me I'd have goosed you, then struck up a cheeky conversation about how the "art of goosing" was dying. Then I'd have gone back to my office and been dismissed for sexual harassment.
I don't even know what "goosing" is. It is dying Chip, with your integrity.
David is back to work and not the least bit happy about it.
Quote: chipolata @ April 7 2010, 8:53 AM BSTIf you'd been ahead of me I'd have goosed you, then struck up a cheeky conversation about how the "art of goosing" was dying. Then I'd have gone back to my office and been dismissed for sexual harassment.
I like goosing every now and then. Keeps people on their toes.
Quote: David Bussell @ April 7 2010, 10:04 AM BSTDavid is back to work and not the least bit happy about it.
I'm back to work too. Boo.
Quote: EllieJP @ April 7 2010, 9:11 AM BSTI don't even know what "goosing" is.
Imagine if you had a goose walking behind you? Imagine what it might do with it's beak? Now imagine my hand is the gooses beak? Do you undertand, Ellie? Do you?
In other news, Chip's just spoken to a very upper-crust woman with a double-barrelled name. Quite sexy for a poshy.
SlagA is happier than he's been for a long long time. 
Why no smiley face then?
Re: goosing. The inner groove of the vinyl LP (and included in the CD version) of Sgt Pepper has a forward and backwards vocal that says (forwards) "I'll never goosey Abbey." Backwards isn't so pleasant, IIRC.
Quote: scratchyr @ April 7 2010, 1:51 PM BSTWhy no smiley face then?
Coz my writing suffers when I'm happy. It suffers when I'm sad too. But less so.
Quote: SlagA @ April 7 2010, 1:53 PM BSTCoz my writing suffers when I'm happy. It suffers when I'm sad too. But less so.
At least you've narrowed it down to just your writing that suffers, I include all readers too.
Quote: chipolata @ April 7 2010, 8:53 AM BSTYou've got an erection?
Oo, top marks for the 'proud' entendre.
Quote: scratchyr @ April 7 2010, 1:54 PM BSTAt least you've narrowed it down to just your writing that suffers, I include all readers too.
You're referring to my readers, not yours, naturally. Mine suffer, yours don't. 
Quote: SlagA @ April 7 2010, 1:57 PM BSTOo, top marks for the 'proud' entendre.
It wasn't hard.
Quote: sootyj @ April 7 2010, 6:42 AM BSTI wouldn't be dressing like an Iraqi if I was you....
I'd be in greater peril if I were to dress as a deer or a quail.
Quote: DaButt @ April 7 2010, 2:08 PM BSTI'd be in greater peril if I were to dress as a deer or a quail.
Or a Gay Pride marcher.
Quote: SlagA @ April 7 2010, 2:09 PM BSTOr a Gay Pride marcher.
I'm sure there are plenty of them out there, but I've yet to meet a veteran who cares whether gays serve in the military. We all served with friends and co-workers who were gay and it was a complete non-issue. What gets people (including my gay veteran friends) riled up is the possibility that the armed forces might become a watered-down shell of its former self, weighed down by political correctness and the need to be all warm and snugly in appearance and demeanor.
Quote: DaButt @ April 7 2010, 2:18 PM BSTWhat gets people (including my gay veteran friends) riled up is the possibility that the armed forces might become a watered-down shell of its former self, weighed down by political correctness and the need to be all warm and snugly in appearance and demeanor.
I wouldn't worry about that, gays can be incredibly bitchy and catty. An openly gay army might prove to be one of the most intimidating ever. Certainly the most cutting.