Well I still don't get it, but I'm used to that. 
I read the news today oh boy! Page 60
On a lighter note... 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6966402.ece
This country really is f**ked up. Well at least our "human rights" legislation is. 
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 6:21 PM GMTAll I will otherwise say is that a basic knowledge of the laws of physics makes much of the official story a pile of horse shit.
Did I just hear a medical doctor -- a man of science -- side with the kooks and their pathetic grasp of physics and science?
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 6:33 PM GMThttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6966402.ece
"Amy was on her way to a record shop to buy the new CD of her favourite group, Busted, when she stepped into the road near her home in Blackburn and into the car's path."
Talk about speaking ill of the dead...
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 6:33 PM GMTThis country really is f**ked up. Well at least our "human rights" legislation is.
Wow.
Quote: DaButt @ December 24 2009, 6:33 PM GMT
Nope. I've got a pretty good grasp of physics/science thanks. The people with the worst grasp of science, it appears, are the media who are happy to be spoon-fed ridiculous data and theories.
If you want a smoking gun for demolitions, it's there in the form of evidenced chemical signatures, the basic rules of structural engineering, plus any physics equations relating to energy you care to mention. But I'm not getting into any kind of protracted debate on this subject as it always becomes a futile, mud-slinging exercise. That is all.
Quote: DaButt @ December 24 2009, 6:39 PM GMTWow.
Isn't it?
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 6:41 PM GMTNope. I've got a pretty good grasp of physics/science thanks. The people with the worst grasp of science, it appears, are the media who are happy to be spoon-fed ridiculous data and theories.
If you want a smoking gun for demolitions, it's there in the form of evidenced chemical signatures, the basic rules of structural engineering, plus any physics equations relating to energy you care to mention. But I'm not getting into any kind of protracted debate on this subject as it always becomes a futile, mud-slinging exercise. That is all.
The number of actual engineers, scientists and experts who take offence with the official accounts are minuscule. Remove the ones who are crackpots with axes to grind and the number approaches zero. I'm disappointed to hear that you're in their camp.
Quote: DaButt @ December 24 2009, 6:47 PM GMTI'm disappointed to hear that you're in their camp.
Why?
EDIT: Oh, and I'm not in anyone's "camp", just have reached my own conclusions based on the all the available evidence I have seen, that's all. You're ascribing me an agenda I don't have.
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 6:33 PM GMTOn a lighter note...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6966402.ece
This country really is f**ked up. Well at least our "human rights" legislation is.
That is absolutely ridiculous.
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 6:49 PM GMTWhy?
EDIT: Oh, and I'm not in anyone's "camp", just have reached my own conclusions based on the all the available evidence I have seen, that's all. You're ascribing me an agenda I don't have.
I'm lumping you in with anyone who can't understand how:
1) Two 110-story buildings can collapse after being hit by large aircraft, and
2) other buildings can collapse when two 110-story buildings fall on top of them
and would instead rather believe that the U.S. government and untold hundreds/thousands of people conspired to pull it off without leaving a shred of believable evidence.
Yes, but who shot JFK?
I just Googled it; it was Oliver Stone; I knew it was Oliver something or other.
I'm wasted here really.
Quote: zooo @ December 24 2009, 6:59 PM GMTThat is absolutely ridiculous.
Facing deportation? Run over and kill a child, go to prison, go through a protracted legal process, drive illegally again, impregnate a British citizen, show no remorse... you'll be fine.
Quote: Matthew Stott @ December 24 2009, 7:00 PM GMTYes, but who shot JFK?
George W Bush. And I can prove it.
Quote: DaButt @ December 24 2009, 6:59 PM GMTI'm lumping you in with anyone who can't understand how:
1) Two 110-story buildings can collapse after being hit by large aircraft, and
2) other buildings can collapse when two 110-story buildings fall on top of themand would instead rather believe that the U.S. government and untold hundreds/thousands of people conspired to pull it off without leaving a shred of believable evidence.
Please don't include me in any of your crazy conspiracy theories about people trying to undermine the credibility of the US government...
I live in Britain. I have no political allegiances. I keep my opinions to myself and have never actively tried to influence the opinions of anyone else on this matter. I'm no Alex Jones, thank you very much (or for that matter, Bill O'Reilly). The only activist campaign groups I've ever joined are Amnesty and one to prevent Tesco from cutting down some old oak trees.
My opinions are my own and I'll thank you to respect that. Cheers. 
Quote: Tim Walker @ December 24 2009, 7:04 PM GMTPlease don't include me in any of your crazy conspiracy theories about people trying to undermine the credibility of the US government...
I live in Britain. I have no political allegiances. I keep my opinions to myself and have never actively tried to influence the opinions of anyone else on this matter. I'm no Alex Jones, thank you very much (or for that matter, Bill O'Reilly). The only activist campaign groups I've ever joined are Amnesty and one to prevent Tesco from cutting down some old oak trees.
My opinions are my own and I'll thank you to respect that. Cheers.
You're a likable guy and obviously well-educated, but you'll have to get used to the stares and head shakes if you jump on the WTC conspiracy bandwagon in the face of all evidence to the contrary.