Quote: Aaron @ November 27 2009, 9:18 PM GMTMy server's f**ked. Hoepfully it'll be back at some point.
If you mean the strip of flag in your signature, I can see it.
Quote: Aaron @ November 27 2009, 9:18 PM GMTMy server's f**ked. Hoepfully it'll be back at some point.
If you mean the strip of flag in your signature, I can see it.
Quote: Leevil @ November 27 2009, 9:22 PM GMTIf you mean the strip of flag in your signature, I can see it.
Must be stored in your browser's cache. Stupid bloody server.
Quote: Gavin @ November 27 2009, 9:21 PM GMTAgreed. That's not what I'm concerned about at all with this bill.
Quite. Sledgehammer, nut. etc.
(Not to mention the fundamental democratic and freedom issues.)
*shakes fist*
Quote: Leevil @ October 29 2009, 6:55 PM GMTAre you planning on using iMovie?
I have a friend wanting me to edit a film they made for charity, I can't wait to get my hands on all that footage to play with It's a murder mystery too, lots of cool sound effects and music to play with.
Just had a mate wants me to to edit his wedding vid, good practice I guess.
Quote: Marc P @ November 27 2009, 9:35 PM GMTJust had a mate wants me to to edit his wedding vid, good practice I guess.
You should do a horror version as well.
If you need any help, just PM.
Swiss voters have supported a referendum proposal to ban the building of minarets, official results show.
How good of them to explain what a minaret is.
I can't believe people complained about Harry Hill's references to Nazi Germany.
Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 30 2009, 11:03 AM GMTI can't believe people complained about Harry Hill's references to Nazi Germany.
Wankers.
These people do realise they made an official complaint about Vienettas...?
He's been doing a lot more risqué jokes lately, but they're so absurd that they have no basis to cause any offence.
Quote: Dolly Dagger @ November 30 2009, 11:03 AM GMTI can't believe people complained about Harry Hill's references to Nazi Germany.
Dolly, the twelve people that complained all work for the Sun - this is a known tactic. Think about it.
All men watch porn, scientists find
Researchers were conducting a study comparing the views of men in their 20s who had never been exposed to pornography with regular users.
But their project stumbled at the first hurdle when they failed to find a single man who had not been seen it.
"We started our research seeking men in their 20s who had never consumed pornography," said Professor Simon Louis Lajeunesse. "We couldn't find any."
Although hampered in its original aim, the study did examined the habits of those young men who used pornography – which would appear to be all of them.
Prof Lajeunesse interviewed 20 heterosexual male university students who consumed pornography, and found on average, they first watched pornography when they were 10 years old.
Around 90 per cent of consumption was on the internet, while 10 per cent of material came from video stores.
Single men watched pornography for an average of 40 minutes, three times a week, while those in relationships watched it 1.7 times a week for around 20 minutes.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/relationships/6709646/All-men-watch-porn-scientists-find.html
20-40 minutes?! Does that include searching?
Quote: Leevil @ December 2 2009, 7:28 PM GMT20-40 minutes?! Does that include searching?
Searching? Is that what Brits call wiping their spunk on an old sock?