Micheal Jacob
Wednesday 2nd December 2009 7:19pm
Manchester
299 posts
I've been away for a couple of days, and have just caught up with this interesting thread.
Everything starts with a good script, of course, but I - and all my colleagues - have read or developed some outstanding scripts which haven't been made because they don't fit with commissioning or with a channel, some by known writers, some by unknowns.
I think that networking can be over-emphasised. I didn't have a clue who Brian Dooley was when I read the first 10-minute scripts of The Smoking Room, for example. Work always speaks for itself, and the only question with 'unknown' writers is whether they can produce five more scripts of equal quality. Knowing someone just means they will read your work.
It's not impossible than an unsolicited script could turn into a show, though I can't think of an instance. We all dream of a wonderful script arriving out of the blue.
The American system allows aspiring writers to start of as team assistants and work their up, but that's only feasible in a team-writing method, when writers are salaried.
In any exercise which involves a number of script submissions, I'd say that real quality is only evident in one per cent, and that is quality of writing rather than the work necessarily being suitable for production.
Marc is a very kind man.